Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Eric Panahi

Internal Medicine Fountain Valley, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1619110830 CMS profile 466408

11180 Warner Ave, Suite 157, Fountain Valley, CA 92708

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$5,815

333 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Eric Panahi of Fountain Valley, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $5,815 across 333 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 90th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,117 109
2024 General $1,294 74
2023 General $762 49
2022 General $851 55
2021 General $350 23
2020 General $296 16
2019 General $144 7

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Eric Panahi
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Eric Panahi were reported at $2,117. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Eric Panahi Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $144 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $296 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $350 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $851 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $762 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $1,294 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $2,117 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Amgen Inc. $1,049 77 payments
  2. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $872 46 payments
  3. Pfizer Inc. $705 51 payments
  4. Mallinckrodt Hospital Products Inc. $689 37 payments
  5. UCB, Inc. $426 20 payments
  6. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $420 19 payments
  7. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $413 22 payments
  8. Radius Health, Inc. $295 13 payments
  9. AbbVie, Inc. $214 9 payments
  10. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $128 6 payments
  11. Other $605 33 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $5,815 333 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. TREMFYA $713 37 payments
  2. ACTHAR $689 37 payments
  3. EVENITY $508 32 payments
  4. XELJANZ $496 39 payments
  5. Otezla $436 40 payments
  6. SAPHNELO $413 22 payments
  7. Prolia $412 25 payments
  8. BENLYSTA $364 18 payments
  9. Enbrel $342 31 payments
  10. Bimzelx $318 16 payments
  11. Other $2,633 145 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 55 drugs

Part D claims

1,741

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$1,847,531

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

41.3%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Actemra Tocilizumab Brand 220 $540,498
Simponi Aria Golimumab Brand 81 $535,522
Simponi Golimumab Brand 17 $138,296
Tymlos Abaloparatide Brand 44 $123,539
Panzyga Immun Glob G(Igg)-Ifas/Glycine Brand 13 $109,656
Remicade Infliximab Brand 13 $92,372
Otezla Apremilast Brand 17 $82,040
Forteo Teriparatide Brand 16 $65,976
Benlysta Belimumab Brand 13 $59,828
Teriparatide Generic 15 $24,545

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 55 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 30 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$487,212

Of which drugs: $335,457

Medicare patients

264

Average age 75

Services billed

62,099

197 women, 67 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%
Osteoporosis 47%
Diabetes 32%
Chronic kidney disease 28%
Ischemic heart disease 26%
COPD 21%
Depression 20%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, tocilizumab, 1 mg J3262 Office 18 49,520 $233,853
Injection, golimumab, 1 mg, for intravenous use J1602 Office 20 9,400 $85,935
Hyaluronan or derivative, hyalgan, supartz or visco-3, for intra-articular injection, per dose J7321 Office 15 44 $2,353
Methotrexate sodium, 50 mg J9260 Office 44 499 $1,022
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 34 41 $28

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 18 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
ACTHAR
  • Mallinckrodt Hospital Products Inc. $182
$182 — —
TREMFYA
  • Janssen Biotech, Inc. $153
$153 — —
Tymlos
  • Radius Health, Inc. $141
$141 44 —
BENLYSTA
  • GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $138
$138 13 —
EVENITY
  • Amgen Inc. $84
$84 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 18 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

333 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record