Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Charles Holladay

Hematology & Oncology North Charleston, SC Medical Doctor

NPI 1215929542 CMS profile 145463

2910 Tricom St, Charleston Cancer Center, North Charleston, SC 29406

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$11,409

562 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$205,071 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, Charles Holladay of North Charleston, SC is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $11,409 across 562 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $205,071 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 73rd percentile of Hematology & Oncology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,065 88
2024 General $2,036 89
2023 General $2,000 99
2022 General $1,832 90
2021 General $1,517 85
2020 General $915 51
2019 General $1,044 60

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Charles Holladay
  • Hematology & Oncology median
  • Middle half of Hematology & Oncology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Charles Holladay were reported at $2,065. Among 8,769 Hematology & Oncology profiles paid that year, the median was $683 and the middle half received between $143 and $3,154.

Show as a table
Year Charles Holladay Hematology & Oncology median Middle half National median
2019 $1,044 $529 $121–$2,516 $163
2020 $915 $339 $82–$2,213 $114
2021 $1,517 $263 $49–$1,965 $132
2022 $1,832 $416 $103–$2,395 $149
2023 $2,000 $542 $125–$2,646 $160
2024 $2,036 $692 $141–$3,008 $164
2025 $2,065 $683 $143–$3,154 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Celgene Corporation $1,006 52 payments
  2. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $964 49 payments
  3. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $848 39 payments
  4. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $681 37 payments
  5. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $574 29 payments
  6. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $562 28 payments
  7. Pfizer Inc. $546 30 payments
  8. Gilead Sciences, Inc. $422 17 payments
  9. Amgen Inc. $411 20 payments
  10. Genentech USA, Inc. $348 22 payments
  11. Other $5,046 239 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $11,069 555 payments
  2. Education $340 7 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. DARZALEX $572 27 payments
  2. KEYTRUDA $521 26 payments
  3. OPDIVO $488 29 payments
  4. REBLOZYL $476 26 payments
  5. Pomalyst $349 17 payments
  6. ZEPZELCA $325 16 payments
  7. IMBRUVICA $306 17 payments
  8. TUKYSA $280 16 payments
  9. KISQALI $269 15 payments
  10. Trodelvy $239 9 payments
  11. Other $10,079 501 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 39 drugs

Part D claims

963

Median for Hematology-Oncology: 604

Drug cost

$5,366,015

Median for Hematology-Oncology: $1,306,514

Branded share of claims

52.1%

Median for Hematology-Oncology: 31.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Imbruvica Ibrutinib Brand 61 $1,095,360
Xtandi Enzalutamide Brand 70 $963,634
Calquence Acalabrutinib Maleate Brand 37 $567,811
Pomalyst Pomalidomide Brand 18 $417,720
Cabometyx Cabozantinib S-Malate Brand 12 $358,291
Kisqali Ribociclib Succinate Brand 19 $312,084
Revlimid Lenalidomide Brand 16 $273,687
Tabrecta Capmatinib Hydrochloride Brand 12 $255,424
Tagrisso Osimertinib Mesylate Brand 13 $212,475
Verzenio Abemaciclib Brand 12 $209,937

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 39 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 8,746 Part D prescribers listed as Hematology-Oncology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 11 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$77,651

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

318

Average age 75

Services billed

1,129

159 women, 159 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 47%
Cancer 45%
Diabetes 36%
Chronic kidney disease 36%
Ischemic heart disease 27%
Atrial fibrillation 26%
Depression 24%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 57 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
REBLOZYL
  • Celgene Corporation $80
  • Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $27
$107 — —
KRAZATI
  • E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $101
$101 — —
SARCLISA
  • GENZYME CORPORATION $78
$78 — —
Pomalyst
  • Celgene Corporation $70
$70 18 —
ICLUSIG
  • Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $58
$58 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 57 with Patron

Records

562 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Hematology & Oncology in South Carolina

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record