Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Bruce Johnson

Rheumatology Elk Grove Village, IL Medical Doctor

NPI 1912043621 CMS profile 222876

800 W Biesterfield Road, Suite 4003, Elk Grove Village, IL 60007

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$14,696

754 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Bruce Johnson of Elk Grove Village, IL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $14,696 across 754 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 78th percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,101 90
2024 General $2,475 112
2023 General $2,269 99
2022 General $1,811 93
2021 General $1,290 87
2020 General $1,977 107
2019 General $2,773 166

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Bruce Johnson
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Bruce Johnson were reported at $2,101. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Bruce Johnson Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $2,773 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $1,977 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $1,290 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $1,811 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $2,269 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $2,475 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $2,101 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Amgen Inc. $2,908 151 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $2,111 144 payments
  3. UCB, Inc. $1,465 81 payments
  4. Pfizer Inc. $923 44 payments
  5. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $863 58 payments
  6. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $823 37 payments
  7. Lilly USA, LLC $719 35 payments
  8. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $600 31 payments
  9. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $534 26 payments
  10. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $494 17 payments
  11. Other $3,257 130 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $14,616 753 payments
  2. Education $80 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. RINVOQ $1,130 68 payments
  2. Cimzia $1,054 63 payments
  3. EVENITY $924 44 payments
  4. XELJANZ $900 43 payments
  5. BENLYSTA $823 37 payments
  6. TREMFYA $729 21 payments
  7. Prolia $728 44 payments
  8. TALTZ $719 35 payments
  9. COSENTYX $666 50 payments
  10. ORENCIA $534 26 payments
  11. Other $7,741 411 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 26 drugs

Part D claims

2,463

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$660,864

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

26.9%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 20 $224,489
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 22 $163,453
Humira Pen Adalimumab Brand 17 $128,332
Xeljanz Xr Tofacitinib Citrate Brand 15 $89,371
Methotrexate Methotrexate Sodium Brand 576 $13,507
Hydroxychloroquine Sulfate Generic 401 $12,494
Leflunomide Generic 78 $5,280
Colchicine Generic 36 $3,627
Duloxetine Hcl Generic 187 $3,103
Celecoxib Generic 78 $3,098

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 26 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 24 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$1,094,325

Of which drugs: $919,570

Medicare patients

485

Average age 75

Services billed

182,183

328 women, 157 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%
Osteoporosis 40%
Ischemic heart disease 30%
Diabetes 26%
Chronic kidney disease 26%
Depression 21%
COPD 16%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, certolizumab pegol, 1 mg (code may be used for medicare when drug administered under the direct supervision of a physician, not for use when drug is self administered) J0717 Office 42 149,800 $539,115
Injection, abatacept, 10 mg (code may be used for medicare when drug administered under the direct supervision of a physician, not for use when drug is self administered) J0129 Office 11 7,075 $238,893
Injection, zoledronic acid, 1 mg J3489 Office 51 255 $1,259
Infusion, normal saline solution, 250 cc J7050 Office 19 157 $81

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 28 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
EVENITY
$183 — —
Cimzia
$167 — 149,800
Bimzelx
$166 — —
RINVOQ
$165 — —
LUPKYNIS
$146 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 28 with Patron

Records

754 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Rheumatology in Illinois

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record