Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Brian Huh

Rheumatology Los Angeles, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1275614455 CMS profile 284235

520 S Virgil Ave Ste 300, Los Angeles, CA 90020

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$90,760

966 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Brian Huh of Los Angeles, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $90,760 across 966 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 92nd percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,585 107
2024 General $2,207 96
2023 General $1,930 86
2022 General $6,423 189
2021 General $16,998 176
2020 General $10,935 93
2019 General $49,682 219

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Brian Huh
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Brian Huh were reported at $2,585. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Brian Huh Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $49,682 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $10,935 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $16,998 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $6,423 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $1,930 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $2,207 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $2,585 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Amgen Inc. $53,032 248 payments
  2. Genzyme Corporation $13,455 42 payments
  3. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $6,669 11 payments
  4. AbbVie, Inc. $4,108 206 payments
  5. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $3,476 11 payments
  6. Pfizer Inc. $1,593 68 payments
  7. UCB, Inc. $1,583 69 payments
  8. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $1,249 67 payments
  9. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $925 45 payments
  10. Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $887 37 payments
  11. Other $3,782 162 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $60,754 33 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $21,947 902 payments
  3. Consulting Fee $5,400 1 payment
  4. Travel and Lodging $2,611 28 payments
  5. Education $47 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Prolia $37,051 97 payments
  2. EVENITY $14,165 78 payments
  3. KEVZARA Inflammation And Immunology $10,145 22 payments
  4. KEVZARA Immunology $6,592 23 payments
  5. KEVZARA Immunology $6,203 17 payments
  6. RINVOQ $2,786 146 payments
  7. XELJANZ $1,362 56 payments
  8. Otezla $1,259 53 payments
  9. Enbrel $1,133 46 payments
  10. SIMPONI ARIA $1,041 59 payments
  11. Other $14,060 628 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 67 drugs

Part D claims

6,793

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$5,760,498

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

28.1%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Rinvoq Upadacitinib Brand 313 $1,909,616
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 109 $795,438
Prolia Denosumab Brand 421 $689,450
Xeljanz Xr Tofacitinib Citrate Brand 112 $622,084
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 57 $474,654
Enbrel Mini Etanercept Brand 29 $206,430
Orencia Clickject Abatacept Brand 24 $134,088
Cimzia (2 Pack) Certolizumab Pegol Brand 20 $110,399
Xeljanz Tofacitinib Citrate Brand 16 $107,337
Otezla Apremilast Brand 22 $106,133

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 67 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 28 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$337,152

Of which drugs: $136,910

Medicare patients

736

Average age 79

Services billed

19,961

579 women, 157 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%
Diabetes 67%
Osteoporosis 60%
Ischemic heart disease 30%
Chronic kidney disease 30%
Depression 23%
Heart failure 20%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Hyaluronan or derivative, euflexxa, for intra-articular injection, per dose J7323 Office 137 733 $68,501
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 25 2,400 $47,421
Hyaluronan or derivative, gelsyn-3, for intra-articular injection, 0.1 mg J7328 Office 14 2,438 $939
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 135 8,565 $877
Influenza vaccine, trivalent derived from cell cultures 90661 Office 22 22 $794
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 40 mg J1030 Office 23 30 $101
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 80 mg J1040 Office 26 26 $77

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 17 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
RINVOQ
$369 313 —
Enbrel
$331 138 —
XELJANZ
$256 128 —
Bimzelx
$171 — —
TREMFYA
$144 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 17 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

966 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Rheumatology in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record