Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Austin Fraser

Rheumatology Metairie, LA Medical Doctor

NPI 1336339118 CMS profile 458579

111 Veterans Memorial Blvd, Suite #404, Metairie, LA 70005

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$11,664

591 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Austin Fraser of Metairie, LA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $11,664 across 591 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 75th percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,761 90
2024 General $2,318 109
2023 General $2,459 122
2022 General $1,935 91
2021 General $1,093 66
2020 General $529 24
2019 General $1,569 89

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Austin Fraser
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Austin Fraser were reported at $1,761. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Austin Fraser Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $1,569 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $529 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $1,093 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $1,935 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $2,459 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $2,318 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $1,761 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $2,795 141 payments
  2. Amgen Inc. $2,362 86 payments
  3. UCB, Inc. $1,159 78 payments
  4. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $829 34 payments
  5. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $807 54 payments
  6. Pfizer Inc. $746 53 payments
  7. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $461 28 payments
  8. Lilly USA, LLC $367 25 payments
  9. Aurinia Pharma U.S., Inc. $351 13 payments
  10. Genentech, Inc. $300 6 payments
  11. Other $1,486 73 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $11,007 581 payments
  2. Education $657 10 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. RINVOQ $2,026 104 payments
  2. Cimzia $837 58 payments
  3. XELJANZ $746 53 payments
  4. TREMFYA $675 26 payments
  5. Otezla $674 22 payments
  6. Enbrel $533 25 payments
  7. COSENTYX $528 38 payments
  8. EVENITY $524 16 payments
  9. Prolia $486 21 payments
  10. Actemra $484 15 payments
  11. Other $5,805 302 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 33 drugs

Part D claims

2,123

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$1,855,727

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

30.9%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 100 $793,099
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 31 $264,043
Rinvoq Upadacitinib Brand 31 $222,655
Kevzara Sarilumab Brand 23 $141,234
Enbrel Mini Etanercept Brand 13 $112,842
Cimzia (2 Pack) Certolizumab Pegol Brand 16 $106,262
Orencia Clickject Abatacept Brand 14 $92,559
Xeljanz Xr Tofacitinib Citrate Brand 13 $70,680
Hydroxychloroquine Sulfate Generic 336 $15,289
Methotrexate Methotrexate Sodium Brand 349 $6,940

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 33 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 31 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$407,881

Of which drugs: $361,759

Medicare patients

167

Average age 74

Services billed

51,875

122 women, 45 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%
Chronic kidney disease 30%
Ischemic heart disease 26%
Osteoporosis 25%
Depression 20%
Diabetes 17%
Atrial fibrillation 14%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, golimumab, 1 mg, for intravenous use J1602 Office 15 11,300 $93,663
Injection, betamethasone acetate 3 mg and betamethasone sodium phosphate 3 mg J0702 Office 11 19 $90
Infusion, normal saline solution, 250 cc J7050 Office 26 81 $28

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 19 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
RINVOQ
  • AbbVie, Inc. $450
$450 31 —
Actemra
  • Genentech, Inc. $300
  • Genentech USA, Inc. $41
$341 — —
LUPKYNIS
  • Aurinia Pharma U.S., Inc. $205
$205 — —
SKYRIZI
  • AbbVie, Inc. $203
$203 — —
TREMFYA
  • Janssen Biotech, Inc. $178
$178 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 19 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

591 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record