Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Ashu Mehta

Rheumatology Crofton, MD Medical Doctor

NPI 1669471348 CMS profile 120419

1655 Crofton Blvd, Suite 101, Crofton, MD 21114

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$8,138

407 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Ashu Mehta of Crofton, MD is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $8,138 across 407 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 68th percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $540 24
2024 General $459 22
2023 General $543 26
2022 General $865 39
2021 General $1,238 61
2020 General $1,636 79
2019 General $2,858 156

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Ashu Mehta
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Ashu Mehta were reported at $540. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Ashu Mehta Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $2,858 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $1,636 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $1,238 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $865 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $543 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $459 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $540 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Amgen Inc. $1,186 59 payments
  2. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $1,003 43 payments
  3. UCB, Inc. $972 49 payments
  4. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $814 44 payments
  5. Pfizer Inc. $661 35 payments
  6. AbbVie, Inc. $651 36 payments
  7. Mallinckrodt Hospital Products Inc. $451 18 payments
  8. Mallinckrodt Enterprises LLC $333 12 payments
  9. Lilly USA, LLC $330 20 payments
  10. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $318 17 payments
  11. Other $1,419 74 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $8,137 406 payments
  2. Education $1 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. ORENCIA $814 44 payments
  2. Cimzia $772 40 payments
  3. TREMFYA $697 27 payments
  4. XELJANZ $552 28 payments
  5. ACTHAR Immunology $451 18 payments
  6. Prolia $436 23 payments
  7. HUMIRA $394 23 payments
  8. ACTHAR Autoimmune And Rare Disease $333 12 payments
  9. BENLYSTA $318 17 payments
  10. TALTZ $306 18 payments
  11. Other $4,429 221 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 17 drugs

Part D claims

661

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$824,463

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

31.9%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 24 $271,087
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 21 $174,602
Otezla Apremilast Brand 32 $158,066
Xeljanz Xr Tofacitinib Citrate Brand 12 $69,334
Xeljanz Tofacitinib Citrate Brand 11 $67,183
Benlysta Belimumab Brand 12 $56,758
Hydroxychloroquine Sulfate Generic 255 $14,535
Methotrexate Methotrexate Sodium Brand 99 $4,174
Diclofenac Sodium Generic 13 $4,107
Colchicine Generic 16 $1,805

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 17 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 30 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$1,119,718

Of which drugs: $921,199

Medicare patients

417

Average age 75

Services billed

76,702

323 women, 94 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Arthritis 75%
High blood pressure 73%
Diabetes 24%
Ischemic heart disease 24%
Osteoporosis 23%
Chronic kidney disease 20%
Depression 19%
Atrial fibrillation 15%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, abatacept, 10 mg (code may be used for medicare when drug administered under the direct supervision of a physician, not for use when drug is self administered) J0129 Office 22 13,050 $442,198
Injection, infliximab, excludes biosimilar, 10 mg J1745 Office 11 2,150 $53,678
Hyaluronan or derivative, orthovisc, for intra-articular injection, per dose J7324 Office 52 420 $41,666
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 29 239 $184

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 9 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
ACTHAR
  • Mallinckrodt Hospital Products Inc. $147
$147 — —
ILARIS
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $57
$57 — —
Cimzia
  • UCB, Inc. $55
$55 — —
ORENCIA
  • E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $52
$52 — 13,050
TREMFYA
  • Janssen Biotech, Inc. $48
$48 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 9 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

407 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Rheumatology in Maryland

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record