Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Asaf Klein

Rheumatology Hewlett, NY Medical Doctor

NPI 1669761631 CMS profile 1396954

1157 Broadway, Hewlett, NY 11557

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$24,531

1,254 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Asaf Klein of Hewlett, NY is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $24,531 across 1,254 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 85th percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,070 99
2024 General $2,907 147
2023 General $4,021 206
2022 General $4,260 230
2021 General $3,619 195
2020 General $3,462 180
2019 General $4,192 197

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Asaf Klein
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Asaf Klein were reported at $2,070. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Asaf Klein Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $4,192 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $3,462 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $3,619 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $4,260 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $4,021 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $2,907 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $2,070 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Amgen Inc. $4,447 220 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $3,178 144 payments
  3. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $2,939 150 payments
  4. Lilly USA, LLC $1,740 91 payments
  5. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $1,641 99 payments
  6. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $1,554 68 payments
  7. Pfizer Inc. $1,546 92 payments
  8. UCB, Inc. $1,438 76 payments
  9. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $744 40 payments
  10. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $665 46 payments
  11. Other $4,639 228 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $24,086 1,241 payments
  2. Education $305 11 payments
  3. Consulting Fee $140 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. TREMFYA $2,400 122 payments
  2. RINVOQ $1,723 86 payments
  3. TALTZ $1,696 89 payments
  4. BENLYSTA $1,554 68 payments
  5. SIMPONI ARIA $1,533 80 payments
  6. EVENITY $1,474 66 payments
  7. Cimzia $1,438 76 payments
  8. XELJANZ $1,354 80 payments
  9. Prolia $1,110 51 payments
  10. COSENTYX $983 56 payments
  11. Other $13,911 755 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 31 drugs

Part D claims

1,642

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$1,068,031

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

21.5%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 38 $328,364
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 25 $253,677
Xeljanz Xr Tofacitinib Citrate Brand 21 $144,880
Rinvoq Upadacitinib Brand 19 $135,457
Cosentyx Sensoready (2 Pens) Secukinumab Brand 15 $129,115
Prolia Denosumab Brand 24 $41,321
Hydroxychloroquine Sulfate Generic 306 $9,906
Methylprednisolone Generic 286 $4,996
Diclofenac Sodium Generic 86 $3,420
Lidocaine Generic 23 $2,642

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 31 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 124 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$1,031,263

Of which drugs: $518,459

Medicare patients

457

Average age 75

Services billed

94,149

340 women, 117 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%
Osteoporosis 47%
Diabetes 35%
Ischemic heart disease 30%
Depression 21%
Cancer 16%
Chronic kidney disease 15%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 112 10,080 $208,353
Injection, certolizumab pegol, 1 mg (code may be used for medicare when drug administered under the direct supervision of a physician, not for use when drug is self administered) J0717 Office 12 42,200 $153,667
Hyaluronan or derivative, gel-one, for intra-articular injection, per dose J7326 Office 17 28 $10,562
Hyaluronan or derivative, durolane, for intra-articular injection, 1 mg J7318 Office 15 1,440 $7,011
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 62 500 $387

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 25 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
COSENTYX
$403 15 —
TREMFYA
$382 — —
BENLYSTA
$273 — —
SAPHNELO
$206 — —
XELJANZ
$177 21 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 25 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

1,254 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Rheumatology in New York

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record