Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Andrew Cho

Ophthalmology Los Angeles, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1225072481 CMS profile 327865

4220 W 3Rd St, Suite 206, Los Angeles, CA 90020

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$20,465

664 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$3,460 paid to institutions, not to them · program year 2020

Through program year 2025, Andrew Cho of Los Angeles, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $20,465 across 664 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $3,460 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 93rd percentile of Ophthalmology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $4,434 101
2024 General $1,568 52
2023 General $2,127 56
2022 General $2,574 92
2021 General $4,680 169
2020 General $2,143 83
2019 General $2,939 111

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Andrew Cho
  • Ophthalmology median
  • Middle half of Ophthalmology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Andrew Cho were reported at $4,434. Among 13,034 Ophthalmology profiles paid that year, the median was $384 and the middle half received between $136 and $917.

Show as a table
Year Andrew Cho Ophthalmology median Middle half National median
2019 $2,939 $258 $104–$655 $163
2020 $2,143 $126 $45–$321 $114
2021 $4,680 $205 $76–$534 $132
2022 $2,574 $266 $100–$678 $149
2023 $2,127 $308 $117–$745 $160
2024 $1,568 $340 $127–$846 $164
2025 $4,434 $384 $136–$917 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Allergan Inc. $1,900 89 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $1,889 61 payments
  3. Kala Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $1,430 13 payments
  4. Alcon Vision LLC $1,414 37 payments
  5. Aerie Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $1,351 63 payments
  6. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $1,264 49 payments
  7. Sight Sciences, Inc. $1,204 30 payments
  8. Bausch & Lomb Americas Inc. $1,093 42 payments
  9. Bausch & Lomb, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $1,040 87 payments
  10. Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $749 20 payments
  11. Other $7,132 173 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $18,017 659 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $1,300 1 payment
  3. Honoraria $600 1 payment
  4. Long term medical supply or device loan $512 1 payment
  5. Gift $37 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. EYSUVIS $1,430 13 payments
  2. Cequa $1,238 47 payments
  3. VYZULTA $997 89 payments
  4. XEN GLAUCOMA TREATMENT SYSTEM $837 18 payments
  5. XDEMVY $749 20 payments
  6. DURYSTA $739 23 payments
  7. Flarex $666 7 payments
  8. OMNI(R) SURGICAL SYSTEM (US) $621 20 payments
  9. rocklatan $512 26 payments
  10. Verion $512 1 payment
  11. Other $13,323 446 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 56 drugs

Part D claims

21,029

Median for Ophthalmology: 891

Drug cost

$5,968,464

Median for Ophthalmology: $68,233

Branded share of claims

48.4%

Median for Ophthalmology: 29.7%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Restasis Cyclosporine Brand 3,485 $3,029,391
Cyclosporine Generic 1,745 $822,101
Vascepa Icosapent Ethyl Brand 804 $369,325
Miebo Perfluorohexyloctane/Pf Brand 262 $268,605
Rhopressa Netarsudil Mesylate Brand 423 $182,898
Cequa Cyclosporine Brand 229 $171,475
Vyzulta Latanoprostene Bunod Brand 368 $142,297
Timoptic Ocudose Timolol Maleate/Pf Brand 171 $114,719
Alphagan P Brimonidine Tartrate Brand 313 $89,015
Xiidra Lifitegrast Brand 81 $66,950

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 56 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 18,260 Part D prescribers listed as Ophthalmology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 57 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$1,651,204

Of which drugs: $726,761

Medicare patients

954

Average age 80

Services billed

11,149

664 women, 290 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Diabetes 63%
Arthritis 63%
Osteoporosis 36%
Chronic kidney disease 29%
Ischemic heart disease 28%
Depression 27%
Heart failure 20%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, aflibercept, 1 mg J0178 Office 104 986 $649,953

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 15 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
VYZULTA
  • Bausch & Lomb Americas Inc. $190
$190 368 —
XDEMVY
  • Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $138
$138 14 —
Cequa
  • Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $132
$132 229 —
TEPEZZA
  • Amgen Inc. $122
$122 — —
Izervay
  • Astellas Pharma US Inc $111
$111 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 15 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

664 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Ophthalmology in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record