Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2022–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Alexander Peck

Rheumatology Los Angeles, CA Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1588197545 CMS profile 3085263

5230 Pacific Concourse Dr Ste 100, Los Angeles, CA 90045

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$8,796

338 records reported · program years 2022–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2022–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Alexander Peck of Los Angeles, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $8,796 across 338 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 70th percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

4 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,619 71
2024 General $3,468 115
2023 General $3,022 137
2022 General $687 15

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Alexander Peck
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Alexander Peck were reported at $1,619. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Alexander Peck Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $0 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $0 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $687 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $3,022 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $3,468 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $1,619 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2022–2025
  1. Amgen Inc. $3,574 130 payments
  2. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $1,103 49 payments
  3. AbbVie, Inc. $1,098 59 payments
  4. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $530 21 payments
  5. UCB, Inc. $414 7 payments
  6. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $280 9 payments
  7. Mallinckrodt Hospital Products Inc. $279 8 payments
  8. Pfizer Inc. $265 9 payments
  9. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $188 8 payments
  10. Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC $150 1 payment
  11. Other $916 37 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2022–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $7,292 296 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $760 1 payment
  3. Education $744 41 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2022–2025
  1. Prolia $1,842 50 payments
  2. EVENITY $1,393 60 payments
  3. TREMFYA $1,073 46 payments
  4. RINVOQ $685 31 payments
  5. BENLYSTA $530 21 payments
  6. SIMPONI ARIA $500 8 payments
  7. Enbrel $399 24 payments
  8. Otezla $296 16 payments
  9. ACTHAR $279 8 payments
  10. XELJANZ $265 9 payments
  11. Other $2,472 106 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 17 drugs

Part D claims

664

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$37,385

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

19.9%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Teriparatide Generic 11 $21,850
Methotrexate Methotrexate Sodium Brand 132 $4,177
Leflunomide Generic 48 $3,862
Hydroxychloroquine Sulfate Generic 72 $1,938
Celecoxib Generic 39 $1,295
Duloxetine Hcl Generic 26 $1,014
Leucovorin Calcium Generic 13 $680
Diclofenac Sodium Generic 23 $655
Prednisone Generic 110 $582
Allopurinol Generic 30 $281

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 17 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 47 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$1,609,767

Of which drugs: $1,463,685

Medicare patients

503

Average age 76

Services billed

113,985

402 women, 101 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Arthritis 75%
Osteoporosis 73%
High blood pressure 69%
Ischemic heart disease 28%
Diabetes 24%
Chronic kidney disease 19%
Depression 18%
COPD 16%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 235 17,280 $357,639
Injection, romosozumab-aqqg, 1 mg J3111 Office 43 26,880 $230,813
Injection, abatacept, 10 mg (code may be used for medicare when drug administered under the direct supervision of a physician, not for use when drug is self administered) J0129 Office 27 5,825 $187,355
Injection, golimumab, 1 mg, for intravenous use J1602 Office 33 14,050 $129,176
Injection, certolizumab pegol, 1 mg (code may be used for medicare when drug administered under the direct supervision of a physician, not for use when drug is self administered) J0717 Office 16 27,600 $99,310
Injection, infliximab, excludes biosimilar, 10 mg J1745 Office 11 880 $21,966
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 15 56 $43

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 20 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Prolia
  • Amgen Inc. $889
$889 — 17,280
TREMFYA
  • Janssen Biotech, Inc. $498
$498 — —
EVENITY
  • Amgen Inc. $274
$274 — 26,880
RINVOQ
  • AbbVie, Inc. $212
$212 — —
OFEV
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $165
$165 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 20 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

338 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Rheumatology in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record