Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Adam Grunbaum

Rheumatology Trinity, FL Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1255522488 CMS profile 56514

9332 State Road 54 Ste 301, Trinity, FL 34655

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$16,617

831 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Adam Grunbaum of Trinity, FL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $16,617 across 831 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 80th percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,788 109
2024 General $2,451 112
2023 General $2,196 104
2022 General $1,659 86
2021 General $2,355 135
2020 General $2,368 113
2019 General $2,800 172

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Adam Grunbaum
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Adam Grunbaum were reported at $2,788. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Adam Grunbaum Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $2,800 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $2,368 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $2,355 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $1,659 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $2,196 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $2,451 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $2,788 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Amgen Inc. $3,272 191 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $2,638 119 payments
  3. UCB, Inc. $1,290 75 payments
  4. Pfizer Inc. $1,034 62 payments
  5. Genzyme Corporation $1,028 24 payments
  6. Horizon Therapeutics plc $804 53 payments
  7. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $745 28 payments
  8. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $670 30 payments
  9. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $633 44 payments
  10. Lilly USA, LLC $585 30 payments
  11. Other $3,919 175 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $16,225 815 payments
  2. Education $392 16 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. RINVOQ $1,663 70 payments
  2. Cimzia $1,019 59 payments
  3. XELJANZ $991 57 payments
  4. KEVZARA $971 14 payments
  5. EVENITY $883 57 payments
  6. Prolia $859 64 payments
  7. Otezla $748 41 payments
  8. Enbrel $599 38 payments
  9. TALTZ $566 28 payments
  10. KINERET $561 29 payments
  11. Other $11,114 589 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 62 drugs

Part D claims

3,833

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$3,045,220

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

23.3%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 56 $474,750
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 48 $371,457
Rinvoq Upadacitinib Brand 33 $206,985
Taltz Autoinjector Ixekizumab Brand 17 $188,714
Tymlos Abaloparatide Brand 59 $181,422
Kevzara Sarilumab Brand 43 $180,138
Xeljanz Xr Tofacitinib Citrate Brand 23 $161,359
Cosentyx Sensoready (2 Pens) Secukinumab Brand 21 $156,985
Orencia Abatacept Brand 22 $134,818
Nucala Mepolizumab Brand 11 $108,828

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 62 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 39 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$1,138,270

Of which drugs: $1,014,017

Medicare patients

506

Average age 73

Services billed

89,301

400 women, 106 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Arthritis 75%
High blood pressure 74%
Osteoporosis 47%
Ischemic heart disease 33%
Chronic kidney disease 32%
Depression 28%
Diabetes 24%
COPD 21%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, abatacept, 10 mg (code may be used for medicare when drug administered under the direct supervision of a physician, not for use when drug is self administered) J0129 Office 15 7,600 $256,914
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 77 7,620 $156,669
Injection, golimumab, 1 mg, for intravenous use J1602 Office 16 11,500 $105,245
Injection, romosozumab-aqqg, 1 mg J3111 Office 12 10,290 $88,219
Injection, zoledronic acid, 1 mg J3489 Office 19 95 $420
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 15 86 $8

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 24 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
RINVOQ
$278 33 —
KEVZARA
$209 43 —
Cimzia
$166 — —
BENLYSTA
$165 12 —
TREMFYA
$147 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 24 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

831 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Rheumatology in Florida

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record