Who Paid My Doc Search
Menu
Research study Program year 2020 Source: CMS Open Payments

TARGET: A Post-Approval Study to Evaluate Targeted SCS Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) Dorsal Root Ganglion (DRG) Stimulation for the Management of Moderate to Severe Chronic, Intractable, Pain of the Lower Limbs Due to CRPS Types I and II

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02800863

Research payments

$276,456

211 payments

Through program year 2020, $276,456 in research payments was reported against TARGET: A Post-Approval Study to Evaluate Targeted SCS Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) Dorsal Root Ganglion (DRG) Stimulation for the Management of Moderate to Severe Chronic, Intractable, Pain of the Lower Limbs Due to CRPS Types I and II, across 211 payments, paid by Abbott Laboratories.

Paid by
Abbott Laboratories
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT02800863

By program year

1 row
Year Kind Amount Payments
2020 Research $276,456 211

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program year 2020
  1. Abbott Laboratories $276,456 211 payments
Who received the money Research payments · program year 2020
  1. Western Institutional Review Board Organisation paid for research $63,158 81 payments
  2. University of Florida Organisation paid for research $20,357 8 payments
  3. Ochsner Clinic Foundation Teaching hospital · LA $17,555 5 payments
  4. The SPNY Foundation Inc Organisation paid for research $16,716 5 payments
  5. Premier Pain Solutions, PLLC Organisation paid for research $13,920 4 payments
  6. Cleveland Clinic Hospital Teaching hospital · OH $12,363 5 payments
  7. Pacific Sports and Interventional Spine Physicians, LLC Organisation paid for research $10,787 4 payments
  8. Nevada Advanced Pain Specialists Organisation paid for research $9,668 4 payments
  9. Ainsworth Institute of Pain Management Organisation paid for research $9,488 4 payments
  10. St Lukes Health Network INC Organisation paid for research $9,250 6 payments

Usually the institution or organisation running the study, not a person.

Records

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

Principal investigators named

10 shown

Named on the study's payments. Being named is not being paid: the money in the figures above went to the recipients listed, not necessarily to these people.

What you are looking at

Research payments are tied to a study. Being named on a study as a principal investigator is reported separately from being paid as a recipient, and the two are not the same thing — a named investigator has not necessarily received the money.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2020

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record