Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Javid Baksh

Pain Medicine Asheville, NC Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1447413190 CMS profile 689654

9 Walden Ridge Dr Ste 10, Ste 10, Asheville, NC 28803

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$115,890

2,666 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$86,044 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2023

Through program year 2025, Javid Baksh of Asheville, NC is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $115,890 across 2,666 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $86,044 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 97th percentile of Pain Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,270 67
2024 General $2,420 85
2023 General $8,900 288
2022 General $31,223 784
2021 General $26,302 750
2020 General $24,021 427
2019 General $20,754 265

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Javid Baksh
  • Pain Medicine median
  • Middle half of Pain Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Javid Baksh were reported at $2,270. Among 2,779 Pain Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $458 and the middle half received between $124 and $1,401.

Show as a table
Year Javid Baksh Pain Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $20,754 $498 $126–$1,682 $163
2020 $24,021 $284 $80–$910 $114
2021 $26,302 $399 $112–$1,219 $132
2022 $31,223 $455 $137–$1,484 $149
2023 $8,900 $484 $128–$1,495 $160
2024 $2,420 $498 $131–$1,540 $164
2025 $2,270 $458 $124–$1,401 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Abbott Laboratories $107,116 2,415 payments
  2. Medtronic, Inc. $3,456 122 payments
  3. Vertos Medical, Inc. $1,873 48 payments
  4. SI-BONE, Inc. $1,008 14 payments
  5. Spinal Simplicity, LLC $678 9 payments
  6. Nalu Medical, Inc. $343 8 payments
  7. Relievant Medsystems, Inc. $258 9 payments
  8. Boston Scientific Corporation $196 5 payments
  9. Foundation Fusion Solutions, LLC $140 1 payment
  10. Painteq LLC $128 1 payment
  11. Other $695 34 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $61,797 2,623 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $41,527 31 payments
  3. Compensation for serving as faculty or as a speaker for a non-accredited and noncertified continuing education program $8,500 5 payments
  4. Compensation for serving as faculty or as a speaker for a medical education program $3,719 4 payments
  5. Travel and Lodging $306 2 payments
  6. Education $41 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. PROCLAIM Neuromodulation $35,712 959 payments
  2. Proclaim Family of SCS IPGs $25,423 462 payments
  3. Proclaim IPG $23,679 648 payments
  4. Neuromodulation Dspsbls and Accs $14,865 37 payments
  5. INCEPTIV $1,814 45 payments
  6. mild Device Kit $1,806 45 payments
  7. OCTRODE $1,557 64 payments
  8. Octrode SCS Leads Cardiac Arrhythmias and Heart Failure $1,057 72 payments
  9. PROCLAIM Neuromodulation $845 14 payments
  10. Octrode SCS Leads Neuromodulation $828 49 payments
  11. Other $7,496 267 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 50 drugs

Part D claims

12,285

Median for Pain Management: 951

Drug cost

$707,955

Median for Pain Management: $26,034

Branded share of claims

45.2%

Median for Pain Management: 29.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Xtampza Er Oxycodone Myristate Brand 238 $112,234
Belbuca Buprenorphine Hcl Brand 135 $92,831
Buprenorphine Generic 372 $76,281
Oxycodone-Acetaminophen Oxycodone Hcl/Acetaminophen Brand 2,215 $61,366
Oxycontin Oxycodone Hcl Brand 112 $48,835
Movantik Naloxegol Oxalate Brand 102 $45,452
Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen Brand 2,012 $44,716
Relistor Methylnaltrexone Bromide Brand 13 $31,090
Oxycodone Hcl Generic 1,776 $26,883
Nucynta Tapentadol Hcl Brand 23 $21,488

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 50 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 2,732 Part D prescribers listed as Pain Management; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 67 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$749,443

Of which drugs: $164

Medicare patients

1,070

Average age 70

Services billed

6,217

667 women, 403 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%
Depression 41%
Diabetes 33%
Chronic kidney disease 27%
Ischemic heart disease 25%
COPD 22%
Osteoporosis 20%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, dexamethasone sodium phosphate, 1 mg J1100 Office 267 1,365 $117
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 11 53 $41

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Records

2,666 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Pain Medicine in North Carolina

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record