Research study Program year 2019 Source: CMS Open Payments

Pcyc-1142-Ca

Research payments

$1,518,433

241 payments

Through program year 2019, $1,518,433 in research payments was reported against Pcyc-1142-Ca, across 241 payments, paid by Pharmacyclics LLC, An AbbVie Company.

Paid by
Pharmacyclics LLC, An AbbVie Company
ClinicalTrials.gov
No trial number was reported for this study

By program year

1 row
Year Kind Amount Payments
2019 Research $1,518,433 241

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program year 2019
  1. Pharmacyclics LLC, An AbbVie Company $1,518,433 241 payments
Who received the money Research payments · program year 2019
  1. Biomedical Research Alliance Organisation paid for research $191,682 20 payments
  2. Strong Memorial Hospital Teaching hospital · NY $178,645 12 payments
  3. Weill Medical College Of Cornell University Organisation paid for research $146,823 5 payments
  4. Uc San Diego School Of Medicine-Cardiovascular Division Organisation paid for research $129,594 10 payments
  5. Ut Md Anderson Cancer Center Teaching hospital · TX $128,127 4 payments
  6. Uci Medical Center Teaching hospital · CA $127,754 8 payments
  7. City Of Hope National Medical Ctr Teaching hospital · CA $91,347 6 payments
  8. Sarah Cannon Research Institute Organisation paid for research $79,228 28 payments
  9. Mgpo Radiology Associates Organisation paid for research $60,410 14 payments
  10. Atrium Health Cabarrus Teaching hospital · NC $43,288 2 payments

Usually the institution or organisation running the study, not a person.

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

Principal investigators named

10 shown

Named on the study's payments. Being named is not being paid: the money in the figures above went to the recipients listed, not necessarily to these people.

What you are looking at

Research payments are tied to a study. Being named on a study as a principal investigator is reported separately from being paid as a recipient, and the two are not the same thing — a named investigator has not necessarily received the money.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2019

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record