Organisation paid for research Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

Weill Medical College of Cornell University

Neither a doctor nor a teaching hospital

Research payments

$37,219,846

5,026 payments

Through program year 2025, Weill Medical College of Cornell University is reported as receiving $37,219,846 in research payments, across 5,026 payments.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $8,267,620 1,206
2024 Research $4,811,073 727
2023 Research $5,117,939 1,105
2022 Research $4,209,894 522
2021 Research $6,441,947 454
2020 Research $4,149,628 422
2019 Research $4,221,745 590

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $4,819,969 317 payments
  2. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $4,247,148 28 payments
  3. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $2,591,890 64 payments
  4. Pfizer Inc. $2,120,603 193 payments
  5. Edwards Lifesciences Corporation $2,050,418 185 payments
  6. Genentech, Inc. $1,868,253 136 payments
  7. Celgene Corporation $1,398,779 66 payments
  8. Abbott Laboratories $1,260,678 188 payments
  9. Sanofi US Services Inc. $1,088,476 33 payments
  10. Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. $1,045,064 27 payments
Studies the money was for Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Multicenter, Randomized Phase II study evaluating Pembrolizumab in combination with chemotherapy and chemoradiation in locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma $1,809,125 4 payments
  2. Post COVID 19 Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure Residu $1,565,868 1 payment
  3. Multicenter, Randomized Phase II study evaluating Pembrolizumab in combination with chemotherapy and chemoradiation in locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma $1,368,734 10 payments
  4. An Open-Label, Multi-Center Phase 1 Study to Investigate the Safety and Tolerability of Regn1979, An Anti-Cd20 X Anti-Cd3 Bispecific Monoclonal Antibody, in Patients With Cd20 B-Cell Malignancies Previously Treated With Cd20-Directed Antibody Therapy $1,014,402 9 payments
  5. Phase 1B Study of Regn5458 (Anti-Bcma X Anti-Cd3 Bispecific Antibody) Plus Other Cancer Treatments for Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma $992,878 196 payments
  6. Multicenter randomized phase II trial of neoadjuvant radioimmunotherapy versus chemoimmunotherapy in patients with clinical stages IB-III (N2) non-small cell lung cancer $985,479 5 payments
  7. An Open-label, First-in-human, Dose-escalation Study of SAR443579 Administered as Single Agent by Intravenous Infusion in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia (R/R AML), B-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (B-ALL) or High Risk-myelodysplasia (HR-MDS) $967,823 11 payments
  8. Magnetismm3 An Openlabel Multicenter Nonrandomized Phase 2 Study of Elranatamab Pf06863135 Monotherapy in Participants With Multiple Myeloma Who Are Refractory to at Least One Proteasome Inhibitor One Immunomodulatory Drug and One Anticd38 Antibody $862,105 38 payments
  9. Prcryo $848,413 4 payments
  10. An Open-Label Study to Assess the Anti-Tumor Activity and Safety of Regn1979, An Anti-Cd20 X Anti-Cd3 Bispecific Antibody, in Patients With Relapsed Or Refractory B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma $839,053 21 payments
What the money was spent on Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Other $296,925 6 payments
  2. Patient care $90,683 8 payments
  3. Non-patient care $70,649 5 payments
  4. Overhead $24,169 2 payments

Only reported on some payments, and a payment can report more than one category, so these amounts overlap.

What you are looking at

A noncovered recipient is an organisation paid for research that is neither an individual clinician nor a teaching hospital — typically a contract research organisation, a foundation or a trial site network. They receive 81% of all reported research money, which is why they appear here at all.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record