Research study Program year 2019 Source: CMS Open Payments

An Open-Label, Multi-Center Phase 1 Study to Investigate the Safety and Tolerability of Regn1979, An Anti-Cd20 X Anti-Cd3 Bispecific Monoclonal Antibody, in Patients With Cd20 B-Cell Malignancies Previously Treated With Cd20-Directed Antibody Therapy

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02290951

Research payments

$2,090,137

33 payments

Through program year 2019, $2,090,137 in research payments was reported against An Open-Label, Multi-Center Phase 1 Study to Investigate the Safety and Tolerability of Regn1979, An Anti-Cd20 X Anti-Cd3 Bispecific Monoclonal Antibody, in Patients With Cd20 B-Cell Malignancies Previously Treated With Cd20-Directed Antibody Therapy, across 33 payments, paid by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc..

Paid by
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT02290951

By program year

1 row
Year Kind Amount Payments
2019 Research $2,090,137 33

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program year 2019
  1. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $2,090,137 33 payments
Who received the money Research payments · program year 2019
  1. Weill Medical College Of Cornell University Organisation paid for research $1,014,402 9 payments
  2. Dana Farber Partners Cancercare INC Organisation paid for research $739,527 6 payments
  3. Rutgers The State University Organisation paid for research $304,114 11 payments
  4. Mayo Clinic College Of Medicine Organisation paid for research $22,741 5 payments
  5. Stanford University Organisation paid for research $9,353 2 payments

Usually the institution or organisation running the study, not a person.

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

Principal investigators named

5 shown

Named on the study's payments. Being named is not being paid: the money in the figures above went to the recipients listed, not necessarily to these people.

What you are looking at

Research payments are tied to a study. Being named on a study as a principal investigator is reported separately from being paid as a recipient, and the two are not the same thing — a named investigator has not necessarily received the money.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2019

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record