Research study Program year 2021 Source: CMS Open Payments

OTTER pivotal study

Research payments

$258,707

157 payments

Through program year 2021, $258,707 in research payments was reported against OTTER pivotal study, across 157 payments, paid by Smith+Nephew, Inc..

Paid by: Smith+Nephew, Inc.
ClinicalTrials.gov: No trial number was reported for this study

By program year

2 rows

Year	Kind	Amount	Payments
2021	Research	$47,987	46
2020	Research	$210,720	111

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2020–2021

Smith+Nephew, Inc. $258,707 157 payments

Who received the money Research payments · program years 2020–2021

Advanced ENT and Allergy, PLLC Organisation paid for research $76,220 20 payments
DaVinci Research, LLC Organisation paid for research $57,256 18 payments
Ear, Nose and Throat Specialists of Abilene Organisation paid for research $38,656 15 payments
The Trustees Of Columbia University In The City Of New York Organisation paid for research $14,843 4 payments
Yale University Organisation paid for research $12,317 14 payments
South Carolina ENT, Allergy & Sleep Medicine Organisation paid for research $10,352 17 payments
Frisco ENT for Children Organisation paid for research $10,030 7 payments
Connecticut Childrens Medical Center Teaching hospital · CT $8,525 5 payments
Albany ENT and Allergy Services PC Organisation paid for research $6,787 12 payments
Southeast Clinical Research Associates, LLC Organisation paid for research $5,687 9 payments

Usually the institution or organisation running the study, not a person.

Records

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

Principal investigators named

10 shown

Named on the study's payments. Being named is not being paid: the money in the figures above went to the recipients listed, not necessarily to these people.

What you are looking at

Research payments are tied to a study. Being named on a study as a principal investigator is reported separately from being paid as a recipient, and the two are not the same thing — a named investigator has not necessarily received the money.