Research study Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

Long-term Extension Study to Assess Safety and Tolerability of Oral Ubrogepant Tablets for the Acute Treatment of Migraine in Children and Adolescents (Ages 6-17)

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05127954

Research payments

$10,314,859

2,632 payments

Through program year 2025, $10,314,859 in research payments was reported against Long-term Extension Study to Assess Safety and Tolerability of Oral Ubrogepant Tablets for the Acute Treatment of Migraine in Children and Adolescents (Ages 6-17), across 2,632 payments, paid by AbbVie, Inc..

Paid by
AbbVie, Inc.
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT05127954

By program year

4 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $1,903,955 701
2024 Research $4,491,116 1,016
2023 Research $2,871,777 684
2022 Research $1,048,010 231

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2022–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $10,314,859 2,632 payments
Who received the money Research payments · program years 2022–2025
  1. Access Clinical Trials INC Organisation paid for research $846,238 65 payments
  2. Pantheon Clinical Research LLC Organisation paid for research $503,331 73 payments
  3. Proven Endpoints LLC Organisation paid for research $340,570 108 payments
  4. Highland Research LLC Dba Highlan Organisation paid for research $253,086 18 payments
  5. Frontier Clinical Research LLC Organisation paid for research $247,324 97 payments
  6. Advanced Research Center INC Organisation paid for research $230,828 34 payments
  7. Preferred Research Partners INC Organisation paid for research $218,137 40 payments
  8. Lumos Clinical Research Center LLC Organisation paid for research $216,837 32 payments
  9. Neostart Corporation Dba Aga Clinic Organisation paid for research $216,675 9 payments
  10. Minneapolis Clinic Of Neurology Ltd Organisation paid for research $215,246 31 payments

Usually the institution or organisation running the study, not a person.

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

Principal investigators named

10 shown

Named on the study's payments. Being named is not being paid: the money in the figures above went to the recipients listed, not necessarily to these people.

What you are looking at

Research payments are tied to a study. Being named on a study as a principal investigator is reported separately from being paid as a recipient, and the two are not the same thing — a named investigator has not necessarily received the money.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record