Organisation paid for research Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

Advanced Research Center Inc

Neither a doctor nor a teaching hospital

Research payments

$27,303,519

3,706 payments

Through program year 2025, Advanced Research Center Inc is reported as receiving $27,303,519 in research payments, across 3,706 payments.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $4,415,908 940
2024 Research $7,483,559 1,120
2023 Research $4,094,022 827
2022 Research $1,660,385 215
2021 Research $2,357,882 214
2020 Research $3,229,279 215
2019 Research $4,062,484 175

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. $4,907,966 324 payments
  2. ITI, Inc. $4,447,309 1,154 payments
  3. AbbVie, Inc. $4,048,867 315 payments
  4. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $2,771,611 74 payments
  5. Allergan Inc. $2,668,276 251 payments
  6. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $2,387,789 1,094 payments
  7. Sage Therapeutics, Inc. $2,110,088 68 payments
  8. Pfizer Inc. $818,711 57 payments
  9. BioXcel Therapeutics, Inc. $564,797 4 payments
  10. Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc. $424,963 20 payments
Studies the money was for Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. A Multinational, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group, Placebo-Controlled Study with an Open-Label, Long-Term Safety Phase to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Olanzapine for Extended-Release Injectable Suspension (TV-44749) for Subcutaneous Use as Treatment of Adult Patients with Schizophrenia $3,874,697 109 payments
  2. Iti-007-452 $3,004,815 732 payments
  3. Phase 3 Randomized, Double-Blind, Multi-Dose, Placebo and Nsaid Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Fasinumab in Patients With Pain Due to Osteoarthritis of the Knee Or Hip $2,274,581 61 payments
  4. A Phase 4, Multicenter, 2-Part Study Composed of A 1-Year Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group, Placebo-Controlled, Active-Comparator, Dose-Optimization Evaluation Followed By A 1-Year Open-Label Evaluation to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Guanfacine Hydrochloride Prolonged-Release (Spd503) in Children and Adolescents Aged 6 to 17 Years With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder $1,316,551 957 payments
  5. A Comparative Study of Sage-217 Plus Sertraline Versus Placebo Plus Sertraline in Adults With Major Depressive Disorder $1,001,947 21 payments
  6. Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized Study With 2 Different Doses of Prucalopride Administered to Male and Female Pediatric Subjects Aged 6 Months to 17 Years With Functional Constipation, Consisting of A 12-Week Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Part (Part A) to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety Followed By A 36-Week Double-Blind Extension Part (Part B) to Document Long-Term Safety Up to Week 48 $965,192 103 payments
  7. A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Risperidone Extended-Release Injectable Suspension (TV-46000) for Subcutaneous Use as Maintenance Treatment in Adult and Adolescent Patients With Schizophrenia $895,386 28 payments
  8. A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Withdrawal,Multicenter Clinical Trial Evaluating the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Cariprazine in A Dose-Reduction Paradigm in Theprevention of Relapse in Patients With Schizophrenia $865,853 48 payments
  9. Open-Label Flexible-dose Study to Evaluate the Long-Term Safety and Tolerability of Cariprazine in the Treatment of Pediatric Participants With Schizophrenia or Bipolar I Disorder $798,959 18 payments
  10. A Phase 3, Open-Label, 1-Year Study of the Safety, Tolerability, and Need for Re-Treatment With Sage-217 in Adult Subjects With Major Depressive Disorder $748,922 38 payments
What the money was spent on Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Other $194,618 13 payments

Only reported on some payments, and a payment can report more than one category, so these amounts overlap.

What you are looking at

A noncovered recipient is an organisation paid for research that is neither an individual clinician nor a teaching hospital — typically a contract research organisation, a foundation or a trial site network. They receive 81% of all reported research money, which is why they appear here at all.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record