Research study Program year 2022 Source: CMS Open Payments

Leopard

Research payments

$424,428

383 payments

Through program year 2022, $424,428 in research payments was reported against Leopard, across 383 payments, paid by Endologix, Inc..

Paid by
Endologix, Inc.
ClinicalTrials.gov
No trial number was reported for this study

By program year

4 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2022 Research $79,884 92
2021 Research $78,238 93
2020 Research $116,609 98
2019 Research $149,697 100

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2019–2022
  1. Endologix, Inc. $424,428 383 payments
Who received the money Research payments · program years 2019–2022
  1. Southern California Institute for Research & Education Organisation paid for research $32,325 5 payments
  2. Valley Vascular Consultants Pc Organisation paid for research $32,290 116 payments
  3. Geisinger Medical Center Teaching hospital · PA $27,625 6 payments
  4. Midwest Aortic & Vascular Institute, P.C. Organisation paid for research $23,805 14 payments
  5. Yale University Organisation paid for research $22,473 11 payments
  6. Rainbow Babies & Childrens Hospita Teaching hospital · OH $22,260 2 payments
  7. Sentara Healthcare Organisation paid for research $21,938 1 payment
  8. ECM Health Group LLC Organisation paid for research $20,712 3 payments
  9. Massachusetts General Hospital Teaching hospital · MA $19,200 7 payments
  10. University Of Iowa Hosp & Clinics Teaching hospital · IA $14,812 4 payments

Usually the institution or organisation running the study, not a person.

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

Principal investigators named

9 shown

Named on the study's payments. Being named is not being paid: the money in the figures above went to the recipients listed, not necessarily to these people.

What you are looking at

Research payments are tied to a study. Being named on a study as a principal investigator is reported separately from being paid as a recipient, and the two are not the same thing — a named investigator has not necessarily received the money.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2022

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record