Research study Program year 2022 Source: CMS Open Payments

CLINICAL STUDY PROTOCOL for the INVESTIGATION Of The Two Level SIMPLIFY CERVICAL ARTIFICIAL DISC

Research payments

$111,724

66 payments

Through program year 2022, $111,724 in research payments was reported against CLINICAL STUDY PROTOCOL for the INVESTIGATION Of The Two Level SIMPLIFY CERVICAL ARTIFICIAL DISC, across 66 payments, paid by NuVasive, Inc..

Paid by
NuVasive, Inc.
ClinicalTrials.gov
No trial number was reported for this study

By program year

2 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2022 Research $4,645 13
2021 Research $107,079 53

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2021–2022
  1. NuVasive, Inc. $111,724 66 payments
Who received the money Research payments · program years 2021–2022
  1. Spine Institute Of Louisiana Organisation paid for research $18,016 7 payments
  2. The Foundation For Spinal Restoration Organisation paid for research $14,378 3 payments
  3. Western Institutional Review Board Organisation paid for research $12,989 22 payments
  4. Carolina Neurosurgery & Spine Assoc Organisation paid for research $12,270 5 payments
  5. Texas Back Institute Research Fdn Organisation paid for research $10,000 1 payment
  6. Northshore University Healthsystem Teaching hospital · IL $8,403 2 payments
  7. Southern Orthopaedic Associates SC Organisation paid for research $8,318 3 payments
  8. Indiana Spine Group Pc Organisation paid for research $6,206 3 payments
  9. Methodist Hospital for Surgery Organisation paid for research $4,400 2 payments
  10. Wcg Irb Organisation paid for research $3,585 10 payments

Usually the institution or organisation running the study, not a person.

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

Principal investigators named

10 shown

Named on the study's payments. Being named is not being paid: the money in the figures above went to the recipients listed, not necessarily to these people.

What you are looking at

Research payments are tied to a study. Being named on a study as a principal investigator is reported separately from being paid as a recipient, and the two are not the same thing — a named investigator has not necessarily received the money.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2022

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record