Research study Program year 2020 Source: CMS Open Payments

CLI00125 - ReCePI

Research payments

$1,279,153

95 payments

Through program year 2020, $1,279,153 in research payments was reported against CLI00125 - ReCePI, across 95 payments, paid by Cerus Corporation.

Paid by
Cerus Corporation
ClinicalTrials.gov
No trial number was reported for this study

By program year

2 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2020 Research $899,087 59
2019 Research $380,067 36

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2019–2020
  1. Cerus Corporation $1,279,153 95 payments
Who received the money Research payments · program years 2019–2020
  1. Duke University Organisation paid for research $376,227 9 payments
  2. Temple University Organisation paid for research $129,080 10 payments
  3. University of Kentucky Research Organisation paid for research $113,070 7 payments
  4. University of Pittsburgh Physicians Organisation paid for research $107,988 10 payments
  5. Mayo Clinic Organisation paid for research $101,094 5 payments
  6. University of Cincinnati Organisation paid for research $88,426 8 payments
  7. Yale University Organisation paid for research $68,228 5 payments
  8. Emory University Hospital Teaching hospital · GA $59,419 7 payments
  9. The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University Organisation paid for research $55,089 7 payments
  10. Vitalant Organisation paid for research $48,199 10 payments

Usually the institution or organisation running the study, not a person.

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

Principal investigators named

10 shown

Named on the study's payments. Being named is not being paid: the money in the figures above went to the recipients listed, not necessarily to these people.

What you are looking at

Research payments are tied to a study. Being named on a study as a principal investigator is reported separately from being paid as a recipient, and the two are not the same thing — a named investigator has not necessarily received the money.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2020

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record