Research study Program year 2024 Source: CMS Open Payments

CIP321 AHCL Pivotal Study

Research payments

$16,515,245

1,181 payments

Through program year 2024, $16,515,245 in research payments was reported against CIP321 AHCL Pivotal Study, across 1,181 payments.

Paid by (largest first)
Medtronic, Inc.; Medtronic MiniMed, Inc.
ClinicalTrials.gov
No trial number was reported for this study

By program year

6 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2024 Research $68,381 35
2023 Research $1,796,312 261
2022 Research $4,343,692 264
2021 Research $4,365,684 248
2020 Research $4,571,029 285
2019 Research $1,370,147 88

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2019–2024
  1. Medtronic, Inc. $10,574,068 808 payments
  2. Medtronic MiniMed, Inc. $5,941,177 373 payments
Who received the money Research payments · program years 2019–2024
  1. University of South Florida Organisation paid for research $1,724,179 63 payments
  2. Seattle Childrens Hospital Teaching hospital · WA $1,619,352 47 payments
  3. Atlanta Diabetes Associates Organisation paid for research $1,388,650 67 payments
  4. Rocky Mountain Diabetes And Osteoporosis Center PA Organisation paid for research $1,190,785 59 payments
  5. Medical Investigations INC Organisation paid for research $957,720 57 payments
  6. Healthpartners Medical Group Organisation paid for research $876,750 60 payments
  7. Yale University Organisation paid for research $752,517 59 payments
  8. Kevin Kaiserman Pediatric Endocrinology · West Covina, CA $719,604 66 payments
  9. Univ Of Mi Hospitals & Hlth Ctrs Teaching hospital · MI $710,116 49 payments
  10. The Univ. Of Colorado Organisation paid for research $693,794 51 payments

Usually the institution or organisation running the study, not a person.

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

Principal investigators named

10 shown

Named on the study's payments. Being named is not being paid: the money in the figures above went to the recipients listed, not necessarily to these people.

What you are looking at

Research payments are tied to a study. Being named on a study as a principal investigator is reported separately from being paid as a recipient, and the two are not the same thing — a named investigator has not necessarily received the money.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2024

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record