Research study Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

Bnt162-17

Research payments

$9,814,413

788 payments

Through program year 2025, $9,814,413 in research payments was reported against Bnt162-17, across 788 payments, paid by BioNTech SE.

Paid by
BioNTech SE
ClinicalTrials.gov
No trial number was reported for this study

By program year

4 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $764,506 22
2024 Research $1,455,999 114
2022 Research $3,465,387 560
2021 Research $4,128,520 92

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. BioNTech SE $9,814,413 788 payments
Who received the money Research payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. California Medical Research Organisation paid for research $3,012,560 101 payments
  2. Clinical Research Consulting Organisation paid for research $1,467,111 54 payments
  3. Amici Clinical Research LLC Organisation paid for research $957,005 80 payments
  4. North Texas Infectious Diseases Consultants PA Organisation paid for research $853,488 70 payments
  5. Clinical Trials Of Texas INC Organisation paid for research $669,181 68 payments
  6. Rochester Clinical Research INC Organisation paid for research $475,770 66 payments
  7. Atlanta Center For Medical Research Organisation paid for research $426,818 56 payments
  8. Fort Worth Medtex Pllc Organisation paid for research $412,906 51 payments
  9. Aventiv Research INC Organisation paid for research $405,053 61 payments
  10. Collaborative Neuroscience Research LLC Organisation paid for research $232,583 27 payments

Usually the institution or organisation running the study, not a person.

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

Principal investigators named

9 shown

Named on the study's payments. Being named is not being paid: the money in the figures above went to the recipients listed, not necessarily to these people.

What you are looking at

Research payments are tied to a study. Being named on a study as a principal investigator is reported separately from being paid as a recipient, and the two are not the same thing — a named investigator has not necessarily received the money.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record