Organisation paid for research Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

Aventiv Research Inc

Neither a doctor nor a teaching hospital

Research payments

$18,056,472

3,023 payments

Through program year 2025, Aventiv Research Inc is reported as receiving $18,056,472 in research payments, across 3,023 payments.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $108,939 56
2024 Research $480,552 116
2023 Research $3,078,270 879
2022 Research $5,623,020 424
2021 Research $4,808,395 276
2020 Research $2,567,353 356
2019 Research $1,389,941 916

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Pfizer Inc. $11,340,390 546 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $2,037,191 190 payments
  3. Moderna TX, Inc. $925,639 635 payments
  4. Emergent BioSolutions Inc. $645,971 748 payments
  5. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $424,473 61 payments
  6. BioNTech SE $405,053 61 payments
  7. Sanofi Pasteur Inc. $373,073 34 payments
  8. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $341,297 8 payments
  9. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $308,166 74 payments
  10. Akebia Therapeutics Inc $265,196 244 payments
Studies the money was for Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. A Phase 123 Placebocontrolled Randomized Observerblind Dosefinding Study to Evaluate the Safety Tolerability Immunogenicity and Efficacy of Sarscov2 Rna Vaccine Candidates Against Covid19 in Healthy Adults $5,004,495 90 payments
  2. Phase 1 Openlabel Dosefinding Study to Evaluate Safety Tolerability and Immunogenicity and Phase 23 Placebocontrolled Observerblinded Safety Tolerability and Immunogenicity Study of A Sarscov2 Rna Vaccine Candidate Against Covid19 in Healthy Children and Young Adults $2,574,864 63 payments
  3. A Phase 3 Randomized Observerblinded Study to Evaluate the Efficacy Safety Tolerability and Immunogenicity of A Modified Rna Vaccine Against Influenza Compared to Licensed Inactivated Influenza Vaccine in Healthy Adults 18 Years of Age Or Older $816,962 71 payments
  4. A Study to Assess Adverse Events and Change in Disease Activity of Intramuscular AGN-151586 Injection in Adult Participants With Glabellar Lines $779,449 22 payments
  5. A Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy Immunogenicity and Safety of Respiratory Syncytial Virus RSV Prefusion F Subunit Vaccine in Adults $644,797 34 payments
  6. A Phase 3 Master Protocol to Evaluate Additional Doses of Bnt162b2 in Healthy Individuals Previously Vaccinated With Bnt162b2 $636,132 34 payments
  7. VELOCITY: An Anthrax Vaccine Clinical Study $613,210 747 payments
  8. A Study to the Assess the Change in Condition and Adverse Events of OnabotulinumtoxinA X Injection in Adult Participants With Glabellar Lines $501,824 25 payments
  9. Bnt162-17 $405,053 61 payments
  10. A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind, Active Comparator-controlled Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Immunogenicity of V116 in Pneumococcal Vaccine na Adults $331,545 6 payments
What the money was spent on Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Patient care $50,212 9 payments
  2. Other $42,437 50 payments

Only reported on some payments, and a payment can report more than one category, so these amounts overlap.

What you are looking at

A noncovered recipient is an organisation paid for research that is neither an individual clinician nor a teaching hospital — typically a contract research organisation, a foundation or a trial site network. They receive 81% of all reported research money, which is why they appear here at all.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record