Research study Program year 2021 Source: CMS Open Payments

An Open-Label, Single-Arm Multicenter Phase 1b/2 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Eribulin Mesylate in Combination With Pembrolizumab in Subjects With Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (mTNBC)

Research payments

$4,218,309

2,394 payments

Through program year 2021, $4,218,309 in research payments was reported against An Open-Label, Single-Arm Multicenter Phase 1b/2 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Eribulin Mesylate in Combination With Pembrolizumab in Subjects With Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (mTNBC), across 2,394 payments, paid by Eisai Inc..

Paid by
Eisai Inc.
ClinicalTrials.gov
No trial number was reported for this study

By program year

3 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2021 Research $653,997 115
2020 Research $256,324 282
2019 Research $3,307,989 1,997

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2019–2021
  1. Eisai Inc. $4,218,309 2,394 payments
Who received the money Research payments · program years 2019–2021
  1. Florida Cancer Affiliates Organisation paid for research $1,422,799 752 payments
  2. Trustees of Columbia University Organisation paid for research $433,612 140 payments
  3. Board Of Regents Of The University Of Wisconsin System Organisation paid for research $349,695 224 payments
  4. Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Teaching hospital · MA $339,343 169 payments
  5. Washington University Organisation paid for research $210,175 115 payments
  6. South Carolina Oncology Associates Organisation paid for research $198,149 170 payments
  7. University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio Organisation paid for research $166,301 150 payments
  8. Dana Farber Partners Cancer Care Organisation paid for research $163,119 39 payments
  9. Trustees Of Columbia University In The City Of New York Organisation paid for research $154,883 24 payments
  10. Minnesota Oncology Organisation paid for research $106,874 118 payments

Usually the institution or organisation running the study, not a person.

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

Principal investigators named

10 shown

Named on the study's payments. Being named is not being paid: the money in the figures above went to the recipients listed, not necessarily to these people.

What you are looking at

Research payments are tied to a study. Being named on a study as a principal investigator is reported separately from being paid as a recipient, and the two are not the same thing — a named investigator has not necessarily received the money.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2021

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record