Research study Program year 2023 Source: CMS Open Payments

A 4-week, Phase III, multicenter, double-masked, vehicle-controlled clinical study to evaluate safety and efficacy of Cenegermin (Oxervate) 20 mcg/mL ophthalmic solution versus vehicle, in patients with severe Sjogrens dry eye disease under treatment with Cyclosporine A (PROTEGO-2 study)

Research payments

$509,683

30 payments

Through program year 2023, $509,683 in research payments was reported against A 4-week, Phase III, multicenter, double-masked, vehicle-controlled clinical study to evaluate safety and efficacy of Cenegermin (Oxervate) 20 mcg/mL ophthalmic solution versus vehicle, in patients with severe Sjogrens dry eye disease under treatment with Cyclosporine A (PROTEGO-2 study), across 30 payments, paid by Dompe Farmaceutici S.p.A..

Paid by
Dompe Farmaceutici S.p.A.
ClinicalTrials.gov
No trial number was reported for this study

By program year

1 row
Year Kind Amount Payments
2023 Research $509,683 30

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program year 2023
  1. Dompe Farmaceutici S.p.A. $509,683 30 payments
Who received the money Research payments · program year 2023
  1. Tufts Medical Center Teaching hospital · MA $202,168 4 payments
  2. Hospital Of The Univ Of Penna Teaching hospital · PA $91,738 4 payments
  3. Johns Hopkins University Organisation paid for research $70,518 6 payments
  4. Houston Eye Associates Organisation paid for research $63,595 6 payments
  5. Eye Consultants of Atlanta, PC Organisation paid for research $43,781 3 payments
  6. Global Research Management Organisation paid for research $27,485 4 payments
  7. West Tennessee Eye Care, PC dba Toyos Clinic Organisation paid for research $10,398 3 payments

Usually the institution or organisation running the study, not a person.

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

Principal investigators named

7 shown

Named on the study's payments. Being named is not being paid: the money in the figures above went to the recipients listed, not necessarily to these people.

What you are looking at

Research payments are tied to a study. Being named on a study as a principal investigator is reported separately from being paid as a recipient, and the two are not the same thing — a named investigator has not necessarily received the money.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2023

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record