Organisation paid for research Program year 2024 Source: CMS Open Payments

Houston Eye Associates

Neither a doctor nor a teaching hospital

Research payments

$803,132

143 payments

Through program year 2024, Houston Eye Associates is reported as receiving $803,132 in research payments, across 143 payments.

By program year

6 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2024 Research $40,600 9
2023 Research $205,341 17
2022 Research $102,091 6
2021 Research $190,050 20
2020 Research $124,897 36
2019 Research $140,154 55

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2019–2024
  1. Glaukos Corporation $298,498 46 payments
  2. Ocular Therapeutix, Inc. $168,035 3 payments
  3. Bausch Health US, LLC $100,251 4 payments
  4. Dompe Farmaceutici S.p.A. $89,114 11 payments
  5. RxSight Inc $40,000 8 payments
  6. Allergan Inc. $25,356 46 payments
  7. EyePoint Pharmaceuticals US, Inc. $21,215 1 payment
  8. Bausch & Lomb Americas Inc. $20,527 3 payments
  9. Shire North American Group Inc $18,472 7 payments
  10. Kala Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $7,650 4 payments
Studies the money was for Research payments · program years 2019–2024
  1. A Study to Document the Safety and Effectiveness of A New Cohesive Ovd When Compared to A Control Ovd $120,778 7 payments
  2. Prospective, Randomized Phase 3 Study Comparing Two Models of a Travoprost Intraocular Implant to Timolol Maleate Ophthalmic Solution, USP, 0.5% $116,558 11 payments
  3. A prospective, multi-center, randomized, parallel-group, controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of OTX-TIC (travoprost) intracameral implant in subjects with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) or ocular hypertension (OHT) $108,518 2 payments
  4. Prospective, Randomized Phase 3 Study Comparing Two Models of a Travoprost Intraocular Implant to Timolol Maleate Ophthalmic Solution, USP, 0.5 $97,610 15 payments
  5. Prospective, Randomized Phase 3 Study Comparing Two Models of a Travoprost Intraocular Implant to Timolol Maleate Ophthalmic Solution, USP, 0.5 $73,332 13 payments
  6. A 4-week, Phase III, multicenter, double-masked, vehicle-controlled clinical study to evaluate safety and efficacy of Cenegermin (Oxervate) 20 mcg/mL ophthalmic solution versus vehicle, in patients with severe Sjogrens dry eye disease under treatment with Cyclosporine A (PROTEGO-2 study) $63,595 6 payments
  7. A prospective, multi-center, randomized, parallel-group, controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of OTX-TIC (travoprost) intracameral implant in subjects with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) or ocular hypertension (OHT) $59,517 1 payment
  8. Pmcs-002 $40,000 8 payments
  9. A 4-week, Phase III, multicenter, double-masked, vehicle-controlled clinical study to evaluate safety and efficacy of Oxervate (cenegermin) 20 mcg/mL ophthalmic solution versus vehicle, in patients with severe Sjogrens dry eye disease (PROTEGO-1 study) $25,519 5 payments
  10. A Phase 3, Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized, Masked, Controlled, Safety and Efficacy Study of a Fluocinolone Acetonide (FA) Intravitreal 0.05 mg Insert (Yutiq 0.05 mg) in Subjects With Chronic Non-Infectious Uveitis Affecting the Posterior Segment of the Eye $21,215 1 payment
What the money was spent on Research payments · program years 2019–2024
  1. Other $2,022 2 payments

Only reported on some payments, and a payment can report more than one category, so these amounts overlap.

What you are looking at

A noncovered recipient is an organisation paid for research that is neither an individual clinician nor a teaching hospital — typically a contract research organisation, a foundation or a trial site network. They receive 81% of all reported research money, which is why they appear here at all.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2024

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record