Research study Program year 2020 Source: CMS Open Payments

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03523585

Research payments

$4,031,272

594 payments

Through program year 2020, $4,031,272 in research payments was reported against , across 594 payments, paid by Daiichi Sankyo Inc..

Paid by
Daiichi Sankyo Inc.
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT03523585

By program year

2 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2020 Research $1,935,367 317
2019 Research $2,095,905 277

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2019–2020
  1. Daiichi Sankyo Inc. $4,031,272 594 payments
Who received the money Research payments · program years 2019–2020
  1. Dana Farber Partners Cancercare, Inc. Organisation paid for research $455,302 22 payments
  2. Sharp Memorial Hospital Organisation paid for research $347,209 23 payments
  3. Dana Farber Partners Cancer Care INC Organisation paid for research $327,254 16 payments
  4. St. Lukes Hospital of Kansas City Organisation paid for research $290,078 37 payments
  5. Medstar Research Institute Organisation paid for research $281,036 27 payments
  6. Piedmont Cancer Institute, Pc Organisation paid for research $214,949 36 payments
  7. The Regents of The University of California Organisation paid for research $206,221 5 payments
  8. Allegheny Singer Research Institute Organisation paid for research $164,196 30 payments
  9. Yale University Organisation paid for research $124,652 17 payments
  10. Washington University School Of Medicine Organisation paid for research $105,766 20 payments

Usually the institution or organisation running the study, not a person.

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

Principal investigators named

8 shown

Named on the study's payments. Being named is not being paid: the money in the figures above went to the recipients listed, not necessarily to these people.

What you are looking at

Research payments are tied to a study. Being named on a study as a principal investigator is reported separately from being paid as a recipient, and the two are not the same thing — a named investigator has not necessarily received the money.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2020

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record