Product Program year 2020 Source: CMS Open Payments

ViewFlex Xtra ICE Catheter

Device Cardiac Arrhythmias and Heart Failure

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$36,865

282 payments

Research payments

$0

0 payments

Through program year 2020, $36,865 in general payments and $0 in research payments were reported against ViewFlex Xtra ICE Catheter (Cardiac Arrhythmias and Heart Failure).

No combined total These are different kinds of money, reported under different rules. A meal and a clinical trial grant do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

By program year

2 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2020 General $19,661 95
2019 General $17,203 187

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2020
  1. Abbott Laboratories $36,865 282 payments
Top recipients General payments · program year 2020
  1. Harikrishna Tandri Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology · Nashville, TN $5,095 26% · 7 payments
  2. Ashit Patel Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology · Salem, OR $4,481 23% · 3 payments
  3. Hany Demo Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology · Chicago, IL $3,700 19% · 3 payments
  4. Dale Yoo Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology · McKinney, TX $3,200 16% · 3 payments
  5. Ashit Patel Plastic Surgery · Durham, NC $1,520 8% · 1 payment

The top 5 of 56 recipients; each share is of general payments naming this product in 2020.

The top 25 recipients, free in the app

Specialties paid General payments · program year 2020
  1. Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology Internal Medicine $17,642 90% · 42 practitioners
  2. Plastic Surgery $1,520 8% · 1 practitioner
  3. Interventional Cardiology Internal Medicine $167 <1% · 5 practitioners
  4. Cardiovascular Disease Internal Medicine $143 <1% · 3 practitioners
  5. Vascular Neurology Psychiatry & Neurology $102 <1% · 1 practitioner

The top 5 of 8 specialties; each share is of general payments naming this product to practitioners with a specialty in 2020. Each practitioner is counted under their primary specialty.

The top 25 specialties, free in the app

Where the money went General payments · program year 2020
  1. Maryland $5,095 26% · 1 recipient
  2. Oregon $4,481 23% · 1 recipient
  3. Illinois $3,739 19% · 2 recipients
  4. Texas $3,354 17% · 9 recipients
  5. New York $1,636 8% · 3 recipients

The top 5 of 21 states; each share is of general payments naming this product in 2020 where a state was reported.

The top 25 states, free in the app

282 general

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

What you are looking at

Manufacturers name the drug, biological or device a payment relates to. CMS does not give products their own identifiers, so a product here is assembled from how it was reported — a brand may appear under more than one spelling, and this page covers one of them rather than the brand as a whole.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2020

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record