Product Program year 2019 Source: CMS Open Payments

nanoLOCK

Device Spinal Implants

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$460,118

274 payments

Research payments

$0

0 payments

Through program year 2019, $460,118 in general payments and $0 in research payments were reported against nanoLOCK (Spinal Implants).

No combined total These are different kinds of money, reported under different rules. A meal and a clinical trial grant do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

By program year

1 row
Year Kind Amount Payments
2019 General $460,118 274

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program year 2019
  1. Titan Spine, LLC $460,118 274 payments
Top recipients General payments · program year 2019
  1. Gerard Girasole Orthopaedic Surgery of the Spine · Trumbull, CT $72,871 16% · 6 payments
  2. David De Witt Orthopaedic Surgery of the Spine · Appleton, WI $58,433 13% · 5 payments
  3. Jeffrey Spivak Orthopaedic Surgery of the Spine · New York, NY $45,711 10% · 2 payments
  4. Karl Greene Neurological Surgery · Pleasant Prairie, WI $43,309 9% · 2 payments
  5. Thomas Wascher Neurological Surgery · Appleton, WI $43,309 9% · 2 payments

The top 5 of the 100 largest recipients; each share is of general payments naming this product in 2019.

The top 25 recipients, free in the app

Specialties paid General payments · program year 2019
  1. Orthopaedic Surgery of the Spine Orthopaedic Surgery $260,660 61% · 38 practitioners
  2. Neurological Surgery $134,784 31% · 65 practitioners
  3. Orthopaedic Surgery $32,963 8% · 23 practitioners
  4. Vascular Surgery Surgery $197 <1% · 2 practitioners
  5. Internal Medicine $170 <1% · 7 practitioners

The top 5 of 13 specialties; each share is of general payments naming this product to practitioners with a specialty in 2019. Each practitioner is counted under their primary specialty.

The top 25 specialties, free in the app

Where the money went General payments · program year 2019
  1. Wisconsin $151,229 33% · 5 recipients
  2. Connecticut $98,047 21% · 2 recipients
  3. New York $51,113 11% · 9 recipients
  4. Georgia $33,360 7% · 14 recipients
  5. California $26,622 6% · 29 recipients

The top 5 of 34 states; each share is of general payments naming this product in 2019 where a state was reported.

The top 25 states, free in the app

274 general

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

What you are looking at

Manufacturers name the drug, biological or device a payment relates to. CMS does not give products their own identifiers, so a product here is assembled from how it was reported — a brand may appear under more than one spelling, and this page covers one of them rather than the brand as a whole.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2019

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record