Manufacturer or GPO Program year 2019 Source: CMS Open Payments

Titan Spine, LLC

MN, United States

CMS manufacturer 100000010695

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$460,118

274 payments

Research payments

$0

0 payments

Ownership & investment interest

$17,336,967

24 holdings by physicians or their families

Through program year 2019, Titan Spine, LLC reported paying $460,118 in general payments and $0 in research payments to U.S. physicians, teaching hospitals and other recipients.

No combined total These are different kinds of money, reported under different rules. A meal and a clinical trial grant do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

By program year

1 row
Year Kind Amount Payments
2019 General $460,118 274

Breakdown

Top recipients General payments · program year 2019
  1. Gerard Girasole Orthopaedic Surgery of the Spine · Trumbull, CT $72,871 6 payments
  2. David De Witt Orthopaedic Surgery of the Spine · Appleton, WI $58,433 5 payments
  3. Jeffrey Spivak Orthopaedic Surgery of the Spine · New York, NY $45,711 2 payments
  4. Karl Greene Neurological Surgery · Pleasant Prairie, WI $43,309 2 payments
  5. Thomas Wascher Neurological Surgery · Appleton, WI $43,309 2 payments
  6. Betsy Grunch Neurological Surgery · Gainesville, GA $32,223 6 payments
  7. Steven McAnany Orthopaedic Surgery of the Spine · Stamford, CT $25,175 13 payments
  8. Ucsf Medical Center Teaching hospital · CA $25,000 1 payment
  9. Kade Huntsman Orthopaedic Surgery of the Spine · Salt Lake City, UT $19,342 2 payments
  10. Andy Kranenburg Orthopaedic Surgery of the Spine · Medford, OR $17,844 3 payments
Products the payments named General payments · program year 2019
  1. nanoLOCK Spinal Implants $460,118 62% · 152 recipients
  2. Endoskeleton Spinal Implants $284,749 38% · 7 recipients

Each share is of this company’s general payments naming a product in 2019. A payment can name up to five products, so these amounts overlap.

Specialties paid General payments · program year 2019
  1. Orthopaedic Surgery of the Spine Orthopaedic Surgery $260,660 61% · 38 practitioners
  2. Neurological Surgery $134,784 31% · 65 practitioners
  3. Orthopaedic Surgery $32,963 8% · 23 practitioners
  4. Vascular Surgery Surgery $197 <1% · 2 practitioners
  5. Internal Medicine $170 <1% · 7 practitioners

The top 5 of 13 specialties; each share is of this company’s general payments to practitioners with a specialty in 2019. Each practitioner is counted under their primary specialty.

The top 25 specialties, free in the app

Where the money went General payments · program year 2019
  1. Wisconsin $151,229 33% · 5 recipients
  2. Connecticut $98,047 21% · 2 recipients
  3. New York $51,113 11% · 9 recipients
  4. Georgia $33,360 7% · 14 recipients
  5. California $26,622 6% · 29 recipients

The top 5 of 34 states; each share is of this company’s general payments in 2019 where a state was reported.

The top 25 states, free in the app

What the payments were for General payments · program year 2019
  1. Royalty or License $284,749 14 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $123,592 23 payments
  3. Grant $28,500 2 payments
  4. Food and Beverage $13,299 199 payments
  5. Travel and Lodging $8,478 35 payments
  6. Space rental or facility fees (teaching hospital only) $1,500 1 payment
Companies with a similar name General payments · program year 2019
  1. Titan Surgical Group, LLC KS, United States $770,049
  2. Titan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. CA, United States $264,470

Grouped by name only. CMS publishes no corporate ownership, so a shared name does not mean a shared parent.

274 general

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

What you are looking at

Manufacturers of drugs, devices and biologicals, and group purchasing organisations, are required to report the payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. This page shows what this company reported.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2019

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record