Organisation paid for research Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

Regents of Univ of Minnesota

Neither a doctor nor a teaching hospital

Research payments

$1,125,015

83 payments

Through program year 2025, Regents of Univ of Minnesota is reported as receiving $1,125,015 in research payments, across 83 payments.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $22,053 13
2024 Research $288,036 9
2023 Research $29,710 1
2022 Research $436,854 28
2021 Research $313,687 24
2020 Research $14,557 6
2019 Research $20,119 2

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. ADC Therapeutics America, Inc. $579,496 33 payments
  2. Ucb SA $249,891 24 payments
  3. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $249,145 14 payments
  4. TESARO, Inc. $19,703 1 payment
  5. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $12,357 5 payments
  6. Mallinckrodt Hospital Products Inc. $7,988 2 payments
  7. Acacia Pharma Inc $6,020 3 payments
  8. Mallinckrodt Enterprises LLC $416 1 payment
Studies the money was for Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. A Phase 1/2 Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Loncastuximab Tesirine and Ibrutinib in Patients With Advanced Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma or Mantle Cell Lymphoma (LOTIS-3) $325,355 21 payments
  2. A Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase 3 Comparison of Platinum-Based Thera $249,145 14 payments
  3. A Phase 1/2A, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Single-Ascending Dose (Part A, Participant- and Investigator-Blind) and Repeat-Dose (Part B, Participant-, Investigator-, and Sponsor-Blind) Study to Investigate the Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Efficacy (Part B Only) of Ucb1381 in Healthy Study Participants (Part A) and in Study Participants With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis (Part B) $188,691 4 payments
  4. A Phase 2, Open-Label, Single-Arm Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Camidanlumab Tesirine (ADCT-301) in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Hodgkin Lymphoma $125,086 6 payments
  5. A Study to Evaluate the Safety $55,371 1 payment
  6. A Phase 1b Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Safety and Anti-cancer Activity of Loncastuximab Tesirine in Combination With Other Anti-cancer Agents in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory B-cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (LOTIS 7) $43,144 3 payments
  7. Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, PBO-Controlled Study of Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Zilucoplan in Subjects with Generalized Myasthenia Gravis $39,148 7 payments
  8. A Phase 2 Open-label Study of Loncastuximab Tesirine in Combination With Rituximab (Lonca-R) in Previously Untreated Unfit/Frail Patients With Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) (LOTIS-9) $30,540 2 payments
  9. A Phase 1/2A, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Single-Ascending Dose (Part A, Participant- and Investigator-Blind) and Repeat-Dose (Part B, Participant, Investigator, and Sponsor-Blind) Study to Investigate the Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Efficacy (Part B Only) of Ucb1381 in Healthy Study Participants (Part A) and in Study Participants With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis (Part B) $22,053 13 payments
  10. A Study of Niraparib in Patients With Ovarian Cancer Who Have Received at Least Three Previous Chemotherapy Regimens $19,703 1 payment
What the money was spent on Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Other $6,020 3 payments

Only reported on some payments, and a payment can report more than one category, so these amounts overlap.

What you are looking at

A noncovered recipient is an organisation paid for research that is neither an individual clinician nor a teaching hospital — typically a contract research organisation, a foundation or a trial site network. They receive 81% of all reported research money, which is why they appear here at all.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record