Organisation paid for research Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

Ochsner Clinic Foundation

Neither a doctor nor a teaching hospital

Research payments

$3,022,324

390 payments

Through program year 2025, Ochsner Clinic Foundation is reported as receiving $3,022,324 in research payments, across 390 payments.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $246,048 21
2024 Research $698,869 37
2023 Research $577,838 145
2022 Research $546,097 56
2021 Research $203,440 57
2020 Research $355,633 43
2019 Research $394,400 31

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $1,006,157 26 payments
  2. Pfizer Inc. $771,008 62 payments
  3. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $451,325 66 payments
  4. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $249,992 1 payment
  5. Boston Scientific Corporation $127,145 132 payments
  6. Avanos Medical $87,133 26 payments
  7. Penumbra, Inc. $61,375 11 payments
  8. FUJIFILM Medical Systems USA, Inc. $55,000 1 payment
  9. InspireMD Ltd $39,786 2 payments
  10. Astellas Pharma Global Development $37,962 13 payments
Studies the money was for Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Acute Respiratory Illness Surveillance Aris By Monitoring Voice and Illness Symptom Changes Using A Mobile Application in A Lowinterventional Decentralized Study $402,192 1 payment
  2. An Openlabel Multicenter Randomized Phase 3 Study of Firstline Encorafenib Plus Cetuximab With Or Without Chemotherapy Versus Standard of Care Therapy With A Safety Leadin of Encorafenib and Cetuximab Plus Chemotherapy in Participants With Metastatic Braf V600emutant Colorectal Cancer $294,859 58 payments
  3. A phase II trial of pembrolizumab in combination with cisplatin or carboplatin and etoposide in chemotherapy naive patients with metastatic or unresectable high grade gastroenteropancreatic or lung excluding small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma $249,992 1 payment
  4. A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Parallel-Group Study, Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Remibrutinib Versus Teriflunomide in Participants With Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis, Followed By Extended Treatment With Open-Label Remibrutinib $248,847 3 payments
  5. An Open-Label, Randomized, Phase III Study Comparing 177Lu-Psma-617 in Combination With Standard of Care, Versus Standard of Care Alone, in Adult Male Patients With Metastatic Hormone Sensitive Prostate Cancer (Mhspc) $217,930 3 payments
  6. A Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase 3 Comparison of Platinum-Based Thera $190,706 27 payments
  7. A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled, 2-Arm Multicenter Phase 3 Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Ianalumab in Patients With Active Sjogren's Syndrome (Neptunus-1) $158,846 3 payments
  8. A Phase II, Open Label, Randomized, Two-Arm Study to Investigate the E $123,754 19 payments
  9. A Randomized, Two-period Crossover Study to Demonstrate the Comparability of Pharmacokinetics of Subcutaneous Ianalumab Between 2mL Auto-injector/2mL Pre-filled Syringe With 1 mL Pre-filled Syringe in Adult Participants With Autoimmune Disease $93,717 2 payments
  10. A TWINSS Extension Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of CFZ533 (Iscalimab) at Two Dose Levels Administered Subcutaneously in Patients With Sjgren's Syndrome $75,238 3 payments
What the money was spent on Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Other $2,140 2 payments

Only reported on some payments, and a payment can report more than one category, so these amounts overlap.

What you are looking at

A noncovered recipient is an organisation paid for research that is neither an individual clinician nor a teaching hospital — typically a contract research organisation, a foundation or a trial site network. They receive 81% of all reported research money, which is why they appear here at all.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record