Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Zong Tsai

Internal Medicine Torrance, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1871675744 CMS profile 221208

3011 Artesia Blvd, Torrance, CA 90504

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$26,208

1,225 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Zong Tsai of Torrance, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $26,208 across 1,225 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 98th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $3,366 146
2024 General $3,443 163
2023 General $3,176 143
2022 General $4,555 215
2021 General $4,239 201
2020 General $3,793 192
2019 General $3,637 165

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Zong Tsai
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Zong Tsai were reported at $3,366. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Zong Tsai Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $3,637 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $3,793 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $4,239 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $4,555 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $3,176 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $3,443 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $3,366 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Amgen Inc. $3,710 179 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $2,735 155 payments
  3. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $2,383 102 payments
  4. Amarin Pharma Inc. $1,486 73 payments
  5. Alkermes, Inc. $1,376 56 payments
  6. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $1,352 51 payments
  7. Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $1,094 77 payments
  8. ITI, Inc. $1,065 42 payments
  9. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $1,056 44 payments
  10. Kowa Pharmaceuticals America, Inc. $827 40 payments
  11. Other $9,124 406 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $25,870 1,219 payments
  2. Education $188 5 payments
  3. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $150 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. VRAYLAR Neuroscience $1,805 116 payments
  2. Repatha $1,732 83 payments
  3. Otezla $1,491 77 payments
  4. EVENITY $1,433 70 payments
  5. LYBALVI $1,347 55 payments
  6. Prolia $1,286 66 payments
  7. Vascepa $1,265 64 payments
  8. FARXIGA $1,116 46 payments
  9. CAPLYTA $892 36 payments
  10. VRAYLAR Neuroscience $870 63 payments
  11. Other $26,816 1,134 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 109 drugs

Part D claims

6,815

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$3,490,195

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

53.4%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Korlym Mifepristone Brand 26 $539,431
Afrezza Insulin Regular, Human Brand 265 $349,350
Kerendia Finerenone Brand 375 $287,167
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 322 $263,710
Forteo Teriparatide Brand 37 $166,337
Praluent Pen Alirocumab Brand 297 $165,869
Vraylar Cariprazine Hcl Brand 80 $128,312
Prolia Denosumab Brand 73 $122,215
Creon Lipase/Protease/Amylase Brand 82 $118,219
Repatha Sureclick Evolocumab Brand 182 $115,580

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 109 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 35 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$206,065

Of which drugs: $30,851

Medicare patients

102

Average age 76

Services billed

7,775

55 women, 47 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Diabetes 75%
High blood pressure 75%
Chronic kidney disease 75%
Osteoporosis 65%
COPD 53%
Heart failure 37%
Arthritis 36%
Ischemic heart disease 29%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 23 972 $15,641
Vaccine for pneumococcal polysaccharide for injection beneath the skin or into muscle, patient 2 years or older 90732 Office 75 77 $10,072
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 57 59 $4,801
Injection, vitamin b-12 cyanocobalamin, up to 1000 mcg J3420 Office 27 100 $96

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 28 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
VRAYLAR
$377 80 —
AFREZZA
$334 265 —
ARISTADA
$292 — —
Kerendia
$274 375 —
Repatha
$235 243 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 28 with Patron

Records

1,225 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record