Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Yousong Wang

General Practice New Britain, CT Medical Doctor

NPI 1023253200 CMS profile 45875

300 Kensington Ave, New Britain, CT 06051

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$23,138

1,118 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Yousong Wang of New Britain, CT is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $23,138 across 1,118 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 98th percentile of General Practice profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $4,082 170
2024 General $3,629 159
2023 General $3,751 176
2022 General $2,937 153
2021 General $2,433 127
2020 General $2,277 77
2019 General $4,028 256

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Yousong Wang
  • General Practice median
  • Middle half of General Practice
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Yousong Wang were reported at $4,082. Among 4,774 General Practice profiles paid that year, the median was $106 and the middle half received between $35 and $292.

Show as a table
Year Yousong Wang General Practice median Middle half National median
2019 $4,028 $107 $37–$285 $163
2020 $2,277 $75 $25–$213 $114
2021 $2,433 $93 $30–$272 $132
2022 $2,937 $103 $36–$279 $149
2023 $3,751 $106 $34–$276 $160
2024 $3,629 $114 $39–$290 $164
2025 $4,082 $106 $35–$292 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $4,104 211 payments
  2. Amgen Inc. $3,017 150 payments
  3. UCB, Inc. $2,679 123 payments
  4. Horizon Therapeutics plc $2,357 70 payments
  5. Pfizer Inc. $1,718 109 payments
  6. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $1,348 64 payments
  7. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $1,338 74 payments
  8. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,208 57 payments
  9. Lilly USA, LLC $960 55 payments
  10. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $881 57 payments
  11. Other $3,527 148 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $21,486 1,105 payments
  2. Honoraria $1,000 1 payment
  3. Education $651 12 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. RINVOQ $2,800 139 payments
  2. KRYSTEXXA $2,287 67 payments
  3. Cimzia $2,100 102 payments
  4. XELJANZ $1,622 102 payments
  5. BENLYSTA $1,348 64 payments
  6. SAPHNELO $1,208 57 payments
  7. Otezla $962 49 payments
  8. TALTZ $922 52 payments
  9. Enbrel $734 37 payments
  10. STELARA $732 53 payments
  11. Other $12,727 625 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 38 drugs

Part D claims

3,624

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$4,437,209

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

37.8%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Rinvoq Upadacitinib Brand 113 $911,498
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 80 $872,814
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 100 $797,742
Xeljanz Xr Tofacitinib Citrate Brand 105 $631,812
Tavneos Avacopan Brand 29 $484,487
Xeljanz Tofacitinib Citrate Brand 44 $284,907
Actemra Actpen Tocilizumab Brand 27 $128,885
Otezla Apremilast Brand 12 $104,915
Benlysta Belimumab Brand 18 $84,894
Actemra Tocilizumab Brand 20 $67,092

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 38 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 34 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$1,465,854

Of which drugs: $1,388,440

Medicare patients

233

Average age 75

Services billed

159,343

156 women, 77 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%
Osteoporosis 31%
Depression 28%
Ischemic heart disease 24%
Diabetes 23%
Atrial fibrillation 22%
Chronic kidney disease 22%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, golimumab, 1 mg, for intravenous use J1602 Office 53 54,350 $487,123
Injection, certolizumab pegol, 1 mg (code may be used for medicare when drug administered under the direct supervision of a physician, not for use when drug is self administered) J0717 Office 15 56,800 $205,054
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 13 1,380 $28,097
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 28 145 $111

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 30 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
RINVOQ
$626 113 —
SAPHNELO
$312 — —
KRYSTEXXA
$264 — —
XELJANZ
$254 149 —
Cimzia
$210 — 56,800

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 30 with Patron

Records

1,118 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record