Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Young-Jik Lee

Internal Medicine Los Angeles, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1447271036 CMS profile 246745

3663 W 6Th St Ste 103, Los Angeles, CA 90020

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$15,049

657 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Young-Jik Lee of Los Angeles, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $15,049 across 657 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 96th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,520 59
2024 General $1,366 59
2023 General $1,182 51
2022 General $1,618 69
2021 General $3,165 145
2020 General $2,440 120
2019 General $3,757 154

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Young-Jik Lee
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Young-Jik Lee were reported at $1,520. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Young-Jik Lee Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $3,757 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $2,440 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $3,165 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $1,618 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $1,182 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $1,366 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $1,520 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,845 80 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $1,630 72 payments
  3. Amgen Inc. $1,521 52 payments
  4. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $1,460 71 payments
  5. Amarin Pharma Inc. $1,041 35 payments
  6. Pfizer Inc. $841 51 payments
  7. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $657 30 payments
  8. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $643 25 payments
  9. Novo Nordisk Inc $533 23 payments
  10. Lilly USA, LLC $465 22 payments
  11. Other $4,414 196 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $14,998 653 payments
  2. Education $52 4 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. CREON $1,358 60 payments
  2. LINZESS $1,165 48 payments
  3. FARXIGA $1,156 45 payments
  4. EVENITY $968 31 payments
  5. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $854 38 payments
  6. Prolia $789 29 payments
  7. Kerendia $643 25 payments
  8. Vascepa Hypertriglyceridemia $606 16 payments
  9. JARDIANCE $440 21 payments
  10. Vascepa Cardiovascular $435 19 payments
  11. Other $11,686 571 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 264 drugs

Part D claims

37,226

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$3,297,141

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

23.4%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Creon Lipase/Protease/Amylase Brand 591 $504,733
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 360 $236,996
Tradjenta Linagliptin Brand 305 $193,627
Zenpep Lipase/Protease/Amylase Brand 176 $182,805
Vascepa Icosapent Ethyl Brand 550 $155,789
Linzess Linaclotide Brand 232 $143,545
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 132 $138,452
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 158 $124,606
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 160 $114,553
Lidocaine Generic 916 $111,062

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 264 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 60 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$1,384,739

Of which drugs: $15,168

Medicare patients

876

Average age 81

Services billed

20,875

580 women, 296 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 69%
Diabetes 56%
Chronic kidney disease 46%
Depression 35%
Alzheimer's or dementia 33%
Osteoporosis 28%
Ischemic heart disease 27%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Influenza vaccine, trivalent derived from cell cultures 90661 Office 319 321 $11,591
Vaccine for pneumococcal polysaccharide for injection beneath the skin or into muscle, patient 2 years or older 90732 Office 22 22 $2,878
Injection, vitamin b-12 cyanocobalamin, up to 1000 mcg J3420 Office 68 337 $330
5% dextrose/normal saline (500 ml = 1 unit) J7042 Office 61 106 $105
Ringers lactate infusion, up to 1000 cc J7120 Office 32 49 $94

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 20 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
LINZESS
$185 232 —
CREON
$148 591 —
Kerendia
$138 — —
TRELEGY ELLIPTA
$104 68 —
GEMTESA
$94 28 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 20 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

657 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record