Who Paid My Doc
William Marsh
General Practice Cave Creek, AZ Medical Doctor
NPI 1659385441 CMS profile 837059
30012 N Cave Creek Rd Ste 105, Cave Creek, AZ 85331
General payments
$221
Research payments
$0
Ownership & investment interest
$0
Through program year 2020, William Marsh of Cave Creek, AZ is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $221 across 2 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.
No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.
General payments for this record sit in the 52nd percentile of General Practice profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.
By program year
2 rows| Year | Kind | Relative to this record's peak year | Amount | Records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | General | $111 | 1 | |
| 2019 | General | $109 | 1 |
Beside peers
- William Marsh
- General Practice median
- Middle half of General Practice
- National median
In program year 2025, general payments to William Marsh were reported at $0. Among 4,774 General Practice profiles paid that year, the median was $106 and the middle half received between $35 and $292.
Show as a table
| Year | William Marsh | General Practice median | Middle half | National median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | $109 | $107 | $37–$285 | $163 |
| 2020 | $111 | $75 | $25–$213 | $114 |
| 2021 | $0 | $93 | $30–$272 | $132 |
| 2022 | $0 | $103 | $36–$279 | $149 |
| 2023 | $0 | $106 | $34–$276 | $160 |
| 2024 | $0 | $114 | $39–$290 | $164 |
| 2025 | $0 | $106 | $35–$292 | $169 |
Breakdown
A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.
Prescribing to Medicare patients
Part D · data year 2024 · 22 drugsPart D claims
571
Drug cost
$33,501
Branded share of claims
5.8%
| Drug | Type | Relative to their largest | Claims | Drug cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eliquis Apixaban | Brand | 17 | $23,719 | |
| Ezetimibe | Generic | 68 | $1,646 | |
| Atorvastatin Calcium | Generic | 56 | $976 | |
| Levothyroxine Sodium | Generic | 53 | $919 | |
| Metoprolol Succinate | Generic | 35 | $695 | |
| Trazodone Hcl | Generic | 14 | $620 | |
| Losartan Potassium | Generic | 43 | $612 | |
| Pravastatin Sodium | Generic | 29 | $459 | |
| Potassium Chloride | Generic | 11 | $417 | |
| Pantoprazole Sodium | Generic | 24 | $414 |
The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 22 counted.
Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 105,120 Part D prescribers listed as Family Practice; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.
Records
2 reportedEvery payment, record by record
Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.
Related records
General Practice in Arizona
Practitioners in the same specialty and state, ranked by reported value.
All General Practice
Everyone recorded under this specialty, nationwide.
Doctors in Arizona
Every practitioner in the state with a reported payment.
How to read this page
What each amount means, and what it does not mean.
What this means
U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.
An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.
Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.