Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

William Edenfield

Hematology & Oncology Greenville, SC Medical Doctor

NPI 1851396295 CMS profile 219729

900 W Faris Rd, Greenville, SC 29605

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$3,891

76 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$520

Paid to them · 2 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$1,729,109 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, William Edenfield of Greenville, SC is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $3,891 across 76 general payments and $520 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $1,729,109 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 58th percentile of Hematology & Oncology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

8 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $505 14
2024 General $729 15
2023 General $970 25
2022 General $539 7
2021 General $331 5
2020 General $381 4
2019 General $436 6
2019 Research $520 2

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • William Edenfield
  • Hematology & Oncology median
  • Middle half of Hematology & Oncology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to William Edenfield were reported at $505. Among 8,769 Hematology & Oncology profiles paid that year, the median was $683 and the middle half received between $143 and $3,154.

Show as a table
Year William Edenfield Hematology & Oncology median Middle half National median
2019 $436 $529 $121–$2,516 $163
2020 $381 $339 $82–$2,213 $114
2021 $331 $263 $49–$1,965 $132
2022 $539 $416 $103–$2,395 $149
2023 $970 $542 $125–$2,646 $160
2024 $729 $692 $141–$3,008 $164
2025 $505 $683 $143–$3,154 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $413 4 payments
  2. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $396 6 payments
  3. Pfizer Inc. $389 12 payments
  4. Gilead Sciences, Inc. $252 6 payments
  5. BeiGene USA, Inc. $237 3 payments
  6. Incyte Corporation $225 3 payments
  7. SpringWorks Therapeutics, Inc. $166 3 payments
  8. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $151 3 payments
  9. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $139 2 payments
  10. BeOne Medicines USA, Inc. $138 2 payments
  11. Other $1,384 32 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $3,626 69 payments
  2. Education $265 7 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. BRUKINSA $376 5 payments
  2. IMFINZI $221 2 payments
  3. Trodelvy $212 4 payments
  4. OGSIVEO $166 3 payments
  5. KEYTRUDA $151 3 payments
  6. FOUNDATIONONE LIQUID CDX $136 2 payments
  7. KRAZATI $122 1 payment
  8. CALQUENCE $122 1 payment
  9. Tavalisse $116 1 payment
  10. Rezlidhia $116 1 payment
  11. Other $1,542 52 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Celgene Corporation $476 1 payment
  2. Taiho Oncology, Inc. $44 1 payment

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 18 drugs

Part D claims

611

Median for Hematology-Oncology: 604

Drug cost

$642,424

Median for Hematology-Oncology: $1,306,514

Branded share of claims

18%

Median for Hematology-Oncology: 31.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Cabometyx Cabozantinib S-Malate Brand 11 $258,664
Verzenio Abemaciclib Brand 13 $202,975
Brukinsa Zanubrutinib Brand 11 $155,782
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 22 $12,512
Anastrozole Generic 201 $4,597
Tamoxifen Citrate Generic 61 $1,720
Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen Brand 53 $1,413
Exemestane Generic 33 $1,305
Letrozole Generic 36 $1,069
Oxycodone Hcl Generic 22 $906

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 18 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 8,746 Part D prescribers listed as Hematology-Oncology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 9 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$47,201

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

305

Average age 74

Services billed

1,202

245 women, 60 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Cancer 74%
High blood pressure 71%
Arthritis 41%
Depression 25%
Chronic kidney disease 24%
Osteoporosis 23%
Ischemic heart disease 22%
Diabetes 21%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 11 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
OGSIVEO
  • SpringWorks Therapeutics, Inc. $166
$166 — —
ABECMA
  • E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $79
$79 — —
Tavalisse
  • Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $58
$58 — —
Rezlidhia
  • Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $58
$58 — —
SCEMBLIX
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $58
$58 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 11 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

78 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Hematology & Oncology in South Carolina

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record