Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Wadie Toma

Rheumatology Old Bridge, NJ Medical Doctor

NPI 1821163437 CMS profile 219132

3 Hospital Plz, Suite 409, Old Bridge, NJ 08857

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$21,475

908 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Wadie Toma of Old Bridge, NJ is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $21,475 across 908 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 84th percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $3,649 131
2024 General $3,393 120
2023 General $3,581 125
2022 General $3,304 130
2021 General $1,797 114
2020 General $2,122 117
2019 General $3,629 171

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Wadie Toma
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Wadie Toma were reported at $3,649. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Wadie Toma Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $3,629 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $2,122 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $1,797 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $3,304 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $3,581 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $3,393 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $3,649 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Amgen Inc. $3,018 131 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $2,736 127 payments
  3. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $2,166 84 payments
  4. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $2,108 76 payments
  5. Horizon Therapeutics plc $1,575 54 payments
  6. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $1,178 52 payments
  7. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,164 30 payments
  8. Genzyme Corporation $1,120 31 payments
  9. Pfizer Inc. $994 56 payments
  10. UCB, Inc. $967 60 payments
  11. Other $4,451 207 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $20,779 897 payments
  2. Education $391 10 payments
  3. Debt forgiveness $305 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. BENLYSTA $2,166 84 payments
  2. TREMFYA $1,921 48 payments
  3. RINVOQ $1,631 81 payments
  4. SIMPONI ARIA $1,462 44 payments
  5. KRYSTEXXA $1,254 33 payments
  6. SAPHNELO $957 16 payments
  7. Otezla $939 38 payments
  8. XELJANZ $843 46 payments
  9. TALTZ $655 33 payments
  10. Actemra $637 45 payments
  11. Other $11,654 601 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 55 drugs

Part D claims

8,860

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$4,519,256

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

26.3%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 130 $1,156,344
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 127 $986,361
Orencia Clickject Abatacept Brand 55 $354,787
Xeljanz Xr Tofacitinib Citrate Brand 43 $278,085
Rinvoq Upadacitinib Brand 21 $277,173
Gammagard Liquid Immun Glob G(Igg)/Gly/Iga Ov50 Brand 22 $183,532
Taltz Autoinjector (2 Pack) Ixekizumab Brand 12 $158,325
Simponi Golimumab Brand 19 $154,122
Humira(Cf) Adalimumab Brand 21 $141,492
Otezla Apremilast Brand 27 $139,693

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 55 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 29 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$1,785,435

Of which drugs: $1,393,896

Medicare patients

1,114

Average age 73

Services billed

145,185

822 women, 292 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%
Diabetes 40%
Ischemic heart disease 32%
Osteoporosis 32%
Depression 20%
Chronic kidney disease 19%
COPD 18%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, abatacept, 10 mg (code may be used for medicare when drug administered under the direct supervision of a physician, not for use when drug is self administered) J0129 Office 20 15,051 $510,799
Injection, certolizumab pegol, 1 mg (code may be used for medicare when drug administered under the direct supervision of a physician, not for use when drug is self administered) J0717 Office 25 85,201 $309,007
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 94 9,540 $196,379
Injection, golimumab, 1 mg, for intravenous use J1602 Office 15 8,540 $77,275
Hyaluronan or derivative, gel-one, for intra-articular injection, per dose J7326 Office 36 66 $26,525
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 62 820 $620

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 33 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
RINVOQ
$526 21 —
BENLYSTA
$417 — —
KRYSTEXXA
$288 — —
SAPHNELO
$256 — —
TREMFYA
$224 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 33 with Patron

Records

908 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Rheumatology in New Jersey

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record