Who Paid My Doc
Virgina Wright
Clinical Nurse Specialist, Family Health Amarillo, TX Nurse Practitioner
NPI 1881070829 CMS profile 10818671
9092 Westgate Pkwy W, Amarillo, TX 79124
General payments
$16,523
Research payments
$0
Ownership & investment interest
$0
Through program year 2025, Virgina Wright of Amarillo, TX is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $16,523 across 950 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.
No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.
General payments for this record sit in the 98th percentile of Clinical Nurse Specialist, Family Health profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.
By program year
5 rows| Year | Kind | Relative to this record's peak year | Amount | Records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | General | $4,166 | 213 | |
| 2024 | General | $3,695 | 197 | |
| 2023 | General | $3,294 | 199 | |
| 2022 | General | $2,989 | 180 | |
| 2021 | General | $2,380 | 161 |
Beside peers
- Virgina Wright
- Clinical Nurse Specialist, Family Health median
- Middle half of Clinical Nurse Specialist, Family Health
- National median
In program year 2025, general payments to Virgina Wright were reported at $4,166. Among 164 Clinical Nurse Specialist, Family Health profiles paid that year, the median was $216 and the middle half received between $57 and $492.
Show as a table
| Year | Virgina Wright | Clinical Nurse Specialist, Family Health median | Middle half | National median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | $0 | — | — | $163 |
| 2020 | $0 | — | — | $114 |
| 2021 | $2,380 | $151 | $46–$400 | $132 |
| 2022 | $2,989 | $153 | $37–$527 | $149 |
| 2023 | $3,294 | $139 | $50–$451 | $160 |
| 2024 | $3,695 | $150 | $46–$571 | $164 |
| 2025 | $4,166 | $216 | $57–$492 | $169 |
Breakdown
A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.
Prescribing to Medicare patients
Part D · data year 2024 · 53 drugsPart D claims
5,095
Drug cost
$1,184,690
Branded share of claims
16.1%
| Drug | Type | Relative to their largest | Claims | Drug cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab | Brand | 37 | $316,808 | |
| Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept | Brand | 30 | $269,856 | |
| Rinvoq Upadacitinib | Brand | 23 | $183,658 | |
| Otezla Apremilast | Brand | 29 | $154,228 | |
| Orencia Clickject Abatacept | Brand | 15 | $92,006 | |
| Actemra Actpen Tocilizumab | Brand | 14 | $67,542 | |
| Hydroxychloroquine Sulfate | Generic | 693 | $20,363 | |
| Methotrexate Methotrexate Sodium | Brand | 448 | $9,872 | |
| Leflunomide | Generic | 227 | $9,489 | |
| Celecoxib | Generic | 203 | $6,278 |
The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 53 counted.
Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 1,644 Part D prescribers listed as Certified Clinical Nurse Specialist; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.
Payments and prescribing
First 5 of 33 products · payments 2024Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.
| Product | Paid by | Related payments | Part D claims | Part B services |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cimzia |
|
$310 | — | — |
| SAPHNELO |
|
$305 | — | — |
| XELJANZ |
|
$256 | — | — |
| RINVOQ |
|
$251 | 23 | — |
| SKYRIZI |
|
$223 | — | — |
A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.
See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 33 with PatronRecords
950 reportedEvery payment, record by record
Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.
Other Clinical Nurse Specialist, Family Health in Texas
Laura Mizell
Clinical Nurse Specialist, Family Health · Montgomery, TX
Carrie Phillips
Clinical Nurse Specialist, Family Health · Forney, TX
Kristine Luna
Clinical Nurse Specialist, Family Health · Corpus Christi, TX
Maricruz Bloomquist
Clinical Nurse Specialist, Family Health · Weslaco, TX
Claudia Guillen
Clinical Nurse Specialist, Family Health · Weatherford, TX
Michelle Ulrich
Clinical Nurse Specialist, Family Health · Austin, TX
Related records
Clinical Nurse Specialist, Family Health in Texas
Practitioners in the same specialty and state, ranked by reported value.
All Clinical Nurse Specialist, Family Health
Everyone recorded under this specialty, nationwide.
Doctors in Texas
Every practitioner in the state with a reported payment.
How to read this page
What each amount means, and what it does not mean.
What this means
U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.
An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.
Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.