Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Vincent Rella

Hematology & Oncology Danbury, CT Medical Doctor

NPI 1801837711 CMS profile 172347

24 Hospital Ave, Danbury, CT 06810

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$8,973

432 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$1,120 paid to institutions, not to them · program year 2019

Through program year 2025, Vincent Rella of Danbury, CT is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $8,973 across 432 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $1,120 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 69th percentile of Hematology & Oncology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $51 2
2024 General $3,341 155
2023 General $2,819 127
2022 General $633 32
2021 General $86 4
2020 General $362 19
2019 General $1,680 93

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Vincent Rella
  • Hematology & Oncology median
  • Middle half of Hematology & Oncology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Vincent Rella were reported at $51. Among 8,769 Hematology & Oncology profiles paid that year, the median was $683 and the middle half received between $143 and $3,154.

Show as a table
Year Vincent Rella Hematology & Oncology median Middle half National median
2019 $1,680 $529 $121–$2,516 $163
2020 $362 $339 $82–$2,213 $114
2021 $86 $263 $49–$1,965 $132
2022 $633 $416 $103–$2,395 $149
2023 $2,819 $542 $125–$2,646 $160
2024 $3,341 $692 $141–$3,008 $164
2025 $51 $683 $143–$3,154 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $698 35 payments
  2. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $604 27 payments
  3. Celgene Corporation $531 30 payments
  4. AbbVie, Inc. $495 20 payments
  5. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $493 22 payments
  6. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $439 22 payments
  7. Gilead Sciences, Inc. $416 13 payments
  8. Genentech USA, Inc. $399 25 payments
  9. Pharmacyclics LLC, An AbbVie Company $316 14 payments
  10. Genzyme Corporation $279 15 payments
  11. Other $4,302 209 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $8,318 419 payments
  2. Education $654 13 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. IMBRUVICA $449 18 payments
  2. EPKINLY $343 14 payments
  3. KRAZATI $325 15 payments
  4. JEVTANA $314 11 payments
  5. LIBTAYO $306 14 payments
  6. Trodelvy $299 7 payments
  7. OPDIVO $287 15 payments
  8. DARZALEX $274 9 payments
  9. KISQALI $273 16 payments
  10. KEYTRUDA $263 14 payments
  11. Other $7,502 382 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 19 drugs

Part D claims

529

Median for Hematology-Oncology: 604

Drug cost

$1,397,517

Median for Hematology-Oncology: $1,306,514

Branded share of claims

47.1%

Median for Hematology-Oncology: 31.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Jakafi Ruxolitinib Phosphate Brand 37 $724,823
Imbruvica Ibrutinib Brand 16 $291,225
Xtandi Enzalutamide Brand 11 $140,473
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 82 $104,320
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 61 $67,480
Privigen Immun Glob G(Igg)/Pro/Iga 0-50 Brand 24 $63,276
Valacyclovir Valacyclovir Hcl Brand 18 $1,411
Hydroxyurea Generic 66 $1,299
Gabapentin Generic 30 $560
Letrozole Generic 23 $498

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 19 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 8,746 Part D prescribers listed as Hematology-Oncology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 22 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$137,768

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

427

Average age 77

Services billed

2,039

225 women, 202 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 45%
Ischemic heart disease 39%
Chronic kidney disease 38%
Cancer 35%
Diabetes 30%
Atrial fibrillation 25%
Depression 23%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 73 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
ENHERTU
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $131
  • Daiichi Sankyo Inc. $74
$205 — —
EPKINLY
  • AbbVie, Inc. $171
$171 — —
KRAZATI
  • Mirati Therapeutics, Inc. $104
  • E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $53
$157 — —
KISQALI
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $152
$152 — —
IMBRUVICA
  • AbbVie, Inc. $125
$125 16 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 73 with Patron

Records

432 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Hematology & Oncology in Connecticut

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record