Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Vincent Bryan

Internal Medicine Tulsa, OK Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1134129356 CMS profile 96510

6565 S Yale Ave Ste 312, Tulsa, OK 74136

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$14,305

827 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Vincent Bryan of Tulsa, OK is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $14,305 across 827 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 96th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,498 75
2024 General $1,879 108
2023 General $1,988 120
2022 General $2,305 132
2021 General $2,369 143
2020 General $1,729 102
2019 General $2,536 147

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Vincent Bryan
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Vincent Bryan were reported at $1,498. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Vincent Bryan Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $2,536 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $1,729 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $2,369 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $2,305 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $1,988 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $1,879 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $1,498 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $2,184 140 payments
  2. Novo Nordisk Inc $1,803 108 payments
  3. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,290 61 payments
  4. Pfizer Inc. $910 60 payments
  5. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $546 31 payments
  6. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $524 25 payments
  7. Lilly USA, LLC $522 32 payments
  8. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $504 29 payments
  9. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $483 25 payments
  10. Astellas Pharma US Inc $409 19 payments
  11. Other $5,130 297 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $14,170 825 payments
  2. Education $135 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. FARXIGA $1,054 47 payments
  2. UBRELVY $815 38 payments
  3. VRAYLAR $686 61 payments
  4. QULIPTA $548 31 payments
  5. Kerendia $524 25 payments
  6. ENTRESTO $520 29 payments
  7. XARELTO $483 25 payments
  8. ELIQUIS $462 30 payments
  9. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $435 22 payments
  10. Livalo $342 23 payments
  11. Other $10,610 677 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 231 drugs

Part D claims

14,974

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$1,355,769

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

23.8%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 403 $204,594
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 66 $97,258
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 75 $63,910
Austedo Xr Deutetrabenazine Brand 12 $58,243
Ingrezza Valbenazine Tosylate Brand 13 $51,880
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 78 $45,951
Xifaxan Rifaximin Brand 24 $38,689
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 35 $36,069
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 37 $34,933
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 37 $31,769

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 231 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 43 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$115,962

Of which drugs: $5,133

Medicare patients

309

Average age 73

Services billed

11,811

154 women, 155 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 57%
Depression 54%
Diabetes 44%
Heart failure 40%
Chronic kidney disease 40%
Ischemic heart disease 34%
COPD 29%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90653 Office 45 45 $3,682
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 21 146 $109

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 34 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
VRAYLAR
$161 — —
AIRSUPRA
$131 — —
Briviact
$125 33 —
Leqembi
$98 — —
Kerendia
$94 12 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 34 with Patron

Records

827 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Oklahoma

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record