Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Layth Al Attar

Internal Medicine Tulsa, OK Medical Doctor

NPI 1023469269 CMS profile 2398495

1145 S Utica Ave, Ste 364, Tulsa, OK 74104

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$35,241

575 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Layth Al Attar of Tulsa, OK is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $35,241 across 575 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 98th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $14,949 150
2024 General $10,942 135
2023 General $5,871 124
2022 General $2,377 109
2021 General $1,101 57

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Layth Al Attar
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Layth Al Attar were reported at $14,949. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Layth Al Attar Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $0 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $1,101 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $2,377 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $5,871 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $10,942 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $14,949 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Retrophin, Inc. $19,785 75 payments
  2. Horizon Therapeutics plc $4,076 36 payments
  3. Abbott Laboratories $2,488 15 payments
  4. Amgen Inc. $1,435 79 payments
  5. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,256 48 payments
  6. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $960 63 payments
  7. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $536 35 payments
  8. OPKO Pharmaceuticals, LLC $523 32 payments
  9. Relypsa, Inc. $399 24 payments
  10. Mallinckrodt Hospital Products Inc. $395 15 payments
  11. Other $3,389 153 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $12,722 535 payments
  2. Compensation for serving as faculty or as a speaker for a medical education program $8,100 4 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $6,251 25 payments
  4. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $5,350 3 payments
  5. Honoraria $2,565 1 payment
  6. Education $252 7 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Filspari $10,160 19 payments
  2. KRYSTEXXA Krystexxa $4,076 36 payments
  3. CARDIOMEMS $2,357 14 payments
  4. Kerendia $960 63 payments
  5. FARXIGA $743 24 payments
  6. KRYSTEXXA Inflammation/Rare Disease $738 38 payments
  7. LOKELMA $557 24 payments
  8. RAYALDEE $523 32 payments
  9. JYNARQUE $432 16 payments
  10. Veltassa $374 23 payments
  11. Other $4,680 230 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 16 drugs

Part D claims

512

Median for Nephrology: 954

Drug cost

$170,701

Median for Nephrology: $127,050

Branded share of claims

31.4%

Median for Nephrology: 17.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Xphozah Tenapanor Hcl Brand 29 $100,282
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 43 $33,679
Kerendia Finerenone Brand 42 $27,054
Sevelamer Carbonate Generic 36 $5,467
Hydralazine Hcl Generic 39 $674
Furosemide Generic 82 $529
Felodipine Er Felodipine Brand 20 $525
Nifedipine Er Nifedipine Brand 27 $461
Tamsulosin Hcl Generic 30 $439
Lisinopril Generic 48 $388

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 16 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 9,003 Part D prescribers listed as Nephrology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 21 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$191,301

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

481

Average age 71

Services billed

1,795

226 women, 255 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Chronic kidney disease 75%
Diabetes 74%
Heart failure 68%
Ischemic heart disease 58%
Arthritis 52%
Depression 42%
Atrial fibrillation 38%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 17 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
FARXIGA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $326
$326 43 —
KRYSTEXXA
  • Amgen Inc. $300
$300 — —
Kerendia
  • Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $224
$224 42 —
MONOFERRIC
  • Pharmacosmos Therapeutics Inc. $170
$170 — —
LUPKYNIS
  • Aurinia Pharma U.S., Inc. $102
$102 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 17 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

575 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Oklahoma

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record