Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Umar Mahmood

Interventional Pain Medicine Victoria, TX Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1346506185 CMS profile 2787067

2700 Citizens Plz Ste 207, Victoria, TX 77901

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$59,627

891 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Umar Mahmood of Victoria, TX is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $59,627 across 891 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 94th percentile of Interventional Pain Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $5,277 72
2024 General $11,365 64
2023 General $5,945 100
2022 General $7,335 152
2021 General $16,489 234
2020 General $4,811 83
2019 General $8,405 186

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Umar Mahmood
  • Interventional Pain Medicine median
  • Middle half of Interventional Pain Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Umar Mahmood were reported at $5,277. Among 1,891 Interventional Pain Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $657 and the middle half received between $184 and $1,753.

Show as a table
Year Umar Mahmood Interventional Pain Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $8,405 $684 $216–$2,079 $163
2020 $4,811 $382 $122–$1,109 $114
2021 $16,489 $552 $167–$1,554 $132
2022 $7,335 $605 $187–$1,924 $149
2023 $5,945 $671 $195–$1,915 $160
2024 $11,365 $684 $206–$1,837 $164
2025 $5,277 $657 $184–$1,753 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Boston Scientific Corporation $18,592 229 payments
  2. Foundation Fusion Solutions, LLC $11,547 56 payments
  3. Abbott Laboratories $7,718 260 payments
  4. SI-BONE, Inc. $3,839 34 payments
  5. Medtronic, Inc. $3,510 38 payments
  6. Relievant Medsystems, Inc. $2,530 41 payments
  7. Painteq LLC $2,282 28 payments
  8. Nalu Medical, Inc. $1,621 17 payments
  9. Spinal Simplicity, LLC $934 9 payments
  10. Nevro Corp. $761 20 payments
  11. Other $6,292 159 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $31,813 815 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $13,500 2 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $12,951 53 payments
  4. Education $765 4 payments
  5. Entertainment $597 17 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. General - Pain Management $6,184 2 payments
  2. SPECTRA WAVEWRITER $3,296 36 payments
  3. SYNCHROMEDII $2,875 20 payments
  4. PAINTEQ $2,282 28 payments
  5. Proclaim IPG $2,210 75 payments
  6. IFUSE IMPLANT $2,183 23 payments
  7. Proclaim Family of SCS IPGs $2,147 52 payments
  8. General - Therapies $1,879 24 payments
  9. Intracept $1,752 27 payments
  10. GENERAL PAIN MANAGEMENT $1,741 44 payments
  11. Other $23,995 552 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 29 drugs

Part D claims

2,370

Median for Interventional Pain Management: 1,220

Drug cost

$115,858

Median for Interventional Pain Management: $39,344

Branded share of claims

45.4%

Median for Interventional Pain Management: 34.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Qutenza Capsaicin/Skin Cleanser Brand 16 $55,037
Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen Brand 848 $22,712
Botox Onabotulinumtoxina Brand 11 $14,040
Buprenorphine Generic 22 $2,838
Gabapentin Generic 238 $2,754
Tizanidine Hcl Generic 200 $2,102
Pregabalin Generic 99 $2,008
Tramadol Hcl Generic 259 $1,955
Diclofenac Sodium Generic 73 $1,790
Fentanyl Generic 24 $1,437

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 29 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 1,476 Part D prescribers listed as Interventional Pain Management; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 73 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$371,733

Of which drugs: $20,557

Medicare patients

245

Average age 74

Services billed

44,345

145 women, 100 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%
Diabetes 40%
Ischemic heart disease 31%
Depression 31%
Chronic kidney disease 24%
COPD 24%
Atrial fibrillation 21%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 168 35,345 $3,584
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 80 mg J1040 Office 48 72 $553
Low osmolar contrast material, 300-399 mg/ml iodine concentration, per ml Q9967 Office 35 207 $22

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

3 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Qutenza
  • Averitas Pharma Inc. $72
$72 16 —
BELBUCA
  • Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. $47
$47 — —
Xeomin
  • Merz Pharmaceuticals, LLC $30
$30 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

891 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Interventional Pain Medicine in Texas

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record