Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Pankaj Mehta

Interventional Pain Medicine Killeen, TX Medical Doctor

NPI 1073787909 CMS profile 94687

3310 E Central Texas Expy, Bldg B, Ste 201, Killeen, TX 76543

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$2,112,181

3,214 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$58,027

3 holdings reported · through program year 2025

Research they led as principal investigator

$48,607 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, Pankaj Mehta of Killeen, TX is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $2,112,181 across 3,214 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $48,607 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them. They also declared ownership or investment interests valued at $58,027 across 3 holdings.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Interventional Pain Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

10 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $228,629 196
2024 General $284,829 242
2023 General $205,212 383
2022 General $405,740 864
2021 General $320,284 546
2020 General $307,373 404
2019 General $360,115 579
2025 Ownership $18,427 1
2024 Ownership $29,733 1
2023 Ownership $9,867 1

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Pankaj Mehta
  • Interventional Pain Medicine median
  • Middle half of Interventional Pain Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Pankaj Mehta were reported at $228,629. Among 1,891 Interventional Pain Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $657 and the middle half received between $184 and $1,753.

Show as a table
Year Pankaj Mehta Interventional Pain Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $360,115 $684 $216–$2,079 $163
2020 $307,373 $382 $122–$1,109 $114
2021 $320,284 $552 $167–$1,554 $132
2022 $405,740 $605 $187–$1,924 $149
2023 $205,212 $671 $195–$1,915 $160
2024 $284,829 $684 $206–$1,837 $164
2025 $228,629 $657 $184–$1,753 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Abbott Laboratories $967,995 2,130 payments
  2. Boston Scientific Corporation $355,611 291 payments
  3. Aurora Spine, Inc. $324,131 35 payments
  4. Vertiflex, Inc. $186,905 213 payments
  5. Spinal Simplicity, LLC $144,380 161 payments
  6. Relievant Medsystems, Inc. $49,031 90 payments
  7. SurGenTec $37,010 9 payments
  8. Painteq LLC $24,609 119 payments
  9. SPR Therapeutics, Inc $10,622 11 payments
  10. Foundation Fusion Solutions, LLC $2,159 28 payments
  11. Other $9,727 127 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Consulting Fee $731,154 262 payments
  2. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $606,093 223 payments
  3. Compensation for serving as faculty or as a speaker for a medical education program $335,889 182 payments
  4. Compensation for serving as faculty or as a speaker for a non-accredited and noncertified continuing education program $138,525 89 payments
  5. Travel and Lodging $129,090 518 payments
  6. Food and Beverage $93,493 1,915 payments
  7. Education $40,108 12 payments
  8. Royalty or License $37,532 8 payments
  9. Entertainment $297 5 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. PROCLAIM Neuromodulation $323,204 637 payments
  2. ZIP $296,426 33 payments
  3. Neuromodulation Dspsbls and Accs $250,397 223 payments
  4. Superion ISS $186,905 213 payments
  5. Superion Pain Management $145,715 83 payments
  6. HA MINUTEMAN G3-R $144,279 160 payments
  7. SUPERION Pain Management $74,316 53 payments
  8. PROCLAIM Structural Heart $73,014 90 payments
  9. PROCLAIM Neuromodulation $66,364 109 payments
  10. VERIFLEX $64,527 15 payments
  11. Other $535,237 1,693 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 10 drugs

Part D claims

961

Median for Pain Management: 951

Drug cost

$22,566

Median for Pain Management: $26,034

Branded share of claims

74%

Median for Pain Management: 29.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen Brand 584 $11,586
Nucynta Tapentadol Hcl Brand 11 $7,029
Oxycodone-Acetaminophen Oxycodone Hcl/Acetaminophen Brand 91 $1,664
Morphine Sulfate Er Morphine Sulfate Brand 25 $680
Mupirocin Generic 63 $496
Tizanidine Hcl Generic 54 $350
Oxycodone Hcl Generic 24 $270
Gabapentin Generic 43 $234
Cephalexin Generic 51 $188
Tramadol Hcl Generic 15 $69

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 2,732 Part D prescribers listed as Pain Management; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 61 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$197,274

Of which drugs: $967

Medicare patients

255

Average age 66

Services billed

2,356

139 women, 116 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Arthritis 75%
High blood pressure 68%
Diabetes 33%
Depression 28%
Ischemic heart disease 20%
Chronic kidney disease 16%
Osteoporosis 15%
COPD 14%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 21 1,000 $104

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Records

3,214 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Interventional Pain Medicine in Texas

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record