Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Tze Chan

Internal Medicine Newton, IA Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1376579706 CMS profile 62683

300 N 4Th Ave E, Suite 200, Newton, IA 50208

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$13,100

1,052 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Tze Chan of Newton, IA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $13,100 across 1,052 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 96th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,469 111
2024 General $1,344 120
2023 General $1,478 105
2022 General $2,147 157
2021 General $2,263 193
2020 General $2,075 160
2019 General $2,323 206

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Tze Chan
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Tze Chan were reported at $1,469. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Tze Chan Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $2,323 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $2,075 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $2,263 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $2,147 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $1,478 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $1,344 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $1,469 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,837 44 payments
  2. Pfizer Inc. $1,792 199 payments
  3. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $1,102 92 payments
  4. Amgen Inc. $827 78 payments
  5. AbbVie, Inc. $773 62 payments
  6. Novo Nordisk Inc $732 79 payments
  7. Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc. $570 58 payments
  8. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $532 41 payments
  9. Lilly USA, LLC $490 36 payments
  10. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $477 59 payments
  11. Other $3,966 304 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $12,964 1,042 payments
  2. Education $136 10 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. FARXIGA $1,440 23 payments
  2. NURTEC ODT $945 130 payments
  3. ZAVZPRET $633 106 payments
  4. Ozempic $550 66 payments
  5. GEMTESA $525 49 payments
  6. COMIRNATY $510 37 payments
  7. BREZTRI $499 16 payments
  8. RYBELSUS $484 59 payments
  9. XARELTO $480 59 payments
  10. Repatha $435 41 payments
  11. Other $13,482 961 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 213 drugs

Part D claims

17,067

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$1,297,778

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

22.5%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 223 $226,388
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 186 $143,670
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 239 $140,322
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 88 $87,731
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 97 $69,799
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 27 $39,732
Tresiba Flextouch U-200 Insulin Degludec Brand 40 $38,659
Basaglar Kwikpen U-100 Insulin Glargine,hum.Rec.Anlog Brand 73 $35,943
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 45 $32,455
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 40 $29,809

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 213 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 121 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$197,090

Of which drugs: $18,723

Medicare patients

705

Average age 75

Services billed

6,570

389 women, 316 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 47%
Diabetes 35%
Chronic kidney disease 24%
Depression 24%
Ischemic heart disease 22%
Heart failure 19%
Atrial fibrillation 19%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Sarscov2 vac 50 mcg/0.5ml im 91322 Office 60 63 $9,811
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 79 80 $6,068
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 47 424 $294
Injection, ketorolac tromethamine, per 15 mg J1885 Office 16 115 $55
Injection, ceftriaxone sodium, per 250 mg J0696 Office 19 116 $38

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 25 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
NURTEC ODT
$181 — —
VOQUEZNA
$149 — —
ZAVZPRET
$149 — —
BREZTRI
$101 24 —
JARDIANCE
$77 186 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 25 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

1,052 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Iowa

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record