Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Toshimasa Okabe

Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology Seattle, WA Medical Doctor

NPI 1972767762 CMS profile 43780

550 17Th Ave Ste 450, Seattle, WA 98122

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$113,816

278 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$1,950

Paid to them · 1 record reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$230,895 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2023

Through program year 2025, Toshimasa Okabe of Seattle, WA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $113,816 across 278 general payments and $1,950 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $230,895 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 89th percentile of Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

8 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $16,854 32
2024 General $8,884 47
2023 General $14,609 38
2022 General $26,111 65
2021 General $14,845 20
2021 Research $1,950 1
2020 General $15,116 29
2019 General $17,398 47

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Toshimasa Okabe
  • Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology median
  • Middle half of Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Toshimasa Okabe were reported at $16,854. Among 3,064 Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology profiles paid that year, the median was $2,462 and the middle half received between $733 and $7,710.

Show as a table
Year Toshimasa Okabe Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology median Middle half National median
2019 $17,398 $2,361 $585–$8,260 $163
2020 $15,116 $993 $247–$4,351 $114
2021 $14,845 $1,185 $326–$4,739 $132
2022 $26,111 $2,073 $554–$6,789 $149
2023 $14,609 $2,568 $759–$8,159 $160
2024 $8,884 $2,557 $703–$7,403 $164
2025 $16,854 $2,462 $733–$7,710 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Abbott Laboratories $92,892 184 payments
  2. Medical Device Business Services, Inc. $5,201 7 payments
  3. Medtronic Vascular, Inc. $4,960 25 payments
  4. Boston Scientific Corporation $4,888 43 payments
  5. Atricure, Inc. $3,333 3 payments
  6. Medtronic, Inc. $1,733 4 payments
  7. Biosense Webster, Inc. $713 11 payments
  8. Cardiva Medical, Inc. $97 1 payment

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Consulting Fee $54,441 30 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $19,788 80 payments
  3. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $11,505 11 payments
  4. Compensation for serving as faculty or as a speaker for a medical education program $10,250 11 payments
  5. Food and Beverage $9,591 139 payments
  6. Compensation for serving as faculty or as a speaker for a non-accredited and noncertified continuing education program $8,240 7 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. ENSITE PRECISION $31,016 77 payments
  2. TACTICATH ABLATION CATHETER, SENSOR ENABLED $13,278 7 payments
  3. Ensite Cardiac Mapping System $8,077 20 payments
  4. Perclose ProGlide suture mediated closure system Vascular $6,932 11 payments
  5. ADVISOR $6,130 5 payments
  6. Carto 3 System $4,654 6 payments
  7. EnSite Precision Cardiac Mapping System $4,521 6 payments
  8. ENSITE $4,489 8 payments
  9. Perclose ProGlide suture mediated closure system Vascular $3,900 4 payments
  10. Omnilink Elite vascular stent system $2,925 2 payments
  11. Other $18,559 110 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Medtronic, Inc. $1,950 1 payment

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 8 drugs

Part D claims

216

Median for Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology: 1,090

Drug cost

$94,772

Median for Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology: $354,841

Branded share of claims

56%

Median for Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology: 38.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 57 $68,015
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 15 $24,315
Sotalol Sotalol Hcl Brand 30 $539
Flecainide Acetate Generic 15 $475
Diltiazem 24hr Er (Cd) Diltiazem Hcl Brand 19 $466
Metoprolol Succinate Generic 44 $453
Amiodarone Hcl Generic 24 $447
Atenolol Generic 12 $61

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 2,573 Part D prescribers listed as Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 60 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$109,525

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

286

Average age 77

Services billed

883

118 women, 168 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Atrial fibrillation 65%
Ischemic heart disease 46%
Heart failure 44%
Arthritis 42%
Chronic kidney disease 30%
Diabetes 24%
Depression 17%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Records

279 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology in Washington

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record