Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Tira Chaicha-Brom

Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism Austin, TX Medical Doctor

NPI 1548434756 CMS profile 70466

6500 N Mopac, Bldg 3, Ste 200, Austin, TX 78731

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$3,976

186 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$18,785

Paid to them · 5 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$1,741,985 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, Tira Chaicha-Brom of Austin, TX is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $3,976 across 186 general payments and $18,785 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $1,741,985 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 85th percentile of Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

10 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,347 55
2024 General $580 28
2023 General $1,156 55
2023 Research $149 1
2022 General $236 14
2022 Research $17,888 2
2021 General $246 13
2020 General $50 3
2020 Research $749 2
2019 General $360 18

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Tira Chaicha-Brom
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism median
  • Middle half of Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Tira Chaicha-Brom were reported at $1,347. Among 5,868 Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism profiles paid that year, the median was $507 and the middle half received between $135 and $1,838.

Show as a table
Year Tira Chaicha-Brom Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism median Middle half National median
2019 $360 $494 $123–$2,253 $163
2020 $50 $335 $85–$1,841 $114
2021 $246 $398 $88–$1,981 $132
2022 $236 $364 $88–$1,568 $149
2023 $1,156 $420 $113–$1,614 $160
2024 $580 $440 $121–$1,646 $164
2025 $1,347 $507 $135–$1,838 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Amgen Inc. $507 19 payments
  2. Novo Nordisk Inc $463 27 payments
  3. Abbott Laboratories $390 21 payments
  4. Lilly USA, LLC $342 17 payments
  5. Beta Bionics, Inc. $268 5 payments
  6. Dexcom, Inc. $226 10 payments
  7. Insulet Corporation $149 8 payments
  8. Medtronic, Inc. $135 8 payments
  9. Corcept Therapeutics $133 7 payments
  10. Mannkind Corporation $103 3 payments
  11. Other $1,260 61 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $3,592 173 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $175 1 payment
  3. Education $132 10 payments
  4. Gift $77 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. FreeStyle Libre 3 $281 16 payments
  2. Ozempic $265 15 payments
  3. MOUNJARO $238 11 payments
  4. TEPEZZA $226 12 payments
  5. RYBELSUS $224 12 payments
  6. Prolia $209 3 payments
  7. iLet Bionic Pancreas Automated insulin delivery system $161 3 payments
  8. iLet Bionic Pancreas Automated insulin delivery system $161 3 payments
  9. iLet Bionic Pancreas Automated insulin delivery system $161 3 payments
  10. Wegovy $155 10 payments
  11. Other $3,002 134 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Eli Lilly and Company $18,785 5 payments

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 80 drugs

Part D claims

5,392

Median for Endocrinology: 1,959

Drug cost

$2,456,848

Median for Endocrinology: $890,201

Branded share of claims

53.4%

Median for Endocrinology: 57%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 341 $480,328
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 291 $352,976
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 121 $179,526
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 119 $151,880
Teriparatide Generic 37 $132,761
Tymlos Abaloparatide Brand 36 $107,841
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 98 $95,454
Synjardy Xr Empagliflozin/Metformin Hcl Brand 88 $91,470
Tresiba Flextouch U-100 Insulin Degludec Brand 110 $84,392
Sandostatin Lar Depot Octreotide Acetate,mi-Spheres Brand 11 $73,853

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 80 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 6,527 Part D prescribers listed as Endocrinology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 20 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$120,882

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

695

Average age 73

Services billed

3,596

504 women, 191 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 73%
Osteoporosis 46%
Arthritis 44%
Diabetes 43%
Ischemic heart disease 36%
Chronic kidney disease 25%
Depression 20%
Atrial fibrillation 17%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 16 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
JARDIANCE
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $28
  • Lilly USA, LLC $25
$53 119 —
TZIELD
  • SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC $44
$44 — —
Wegovy
  • Novo Nordisk Inc $33
$33 — —
XYOSTED
  • Antares Pharma, Inc. $31
$31 — —
Kerendia
  • Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $21
$21 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 16 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

191 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism in Texas

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record