Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Tina Shah

Rheumatology Kansas City, MO Medical Doctor

NPI 1972766368 CMS profile 43777

4440 Broadway Blvd, Kansas City, MO 64111

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$35,907

82 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$51,387

Paid to them · 14 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$1,142,672 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2023–2025

Through program year 2025, Tina Shah of Kansas City, MO is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $35,907 across 82 general payments and $51,387 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $1,142,672 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 92nd percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

9 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $33,738 40
2024 General $343 8
2024 Research $50,320 3
2023 General $403 22
2023 Research $1,067 11
2022 General $37 2
2021 General $13 1
2020 General $16 1
2019 General $1,358 8

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Tina Shah
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Tina Shah were reported at $33,738. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Tina Shah Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $1,358 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $16 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $13 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $37 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $403 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $343 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $33,738 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $22,185 30 payments
  2. UCB, Inc. $8,696 17 payments
  3. AbbVie, Inc. $4,432 9 payments
  4. Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC $215 8 payments
  5. Amgen Inc. $132 7 payments
  6. Organon LLC $77 3 payments
  7. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $65 4 payments
  8. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $43 1 payment
  9. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $26 1 payment
  10. Aurinia Pharma U.S., Inc. $21 1 payment
  11. Other $15 1 payment

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $14,964 7 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $14,630 4 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $4,387 9 payments
  4. Food and Beverage $1,782 58 payments
  5. Education $144 4 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. TREMFYA $21,126 33 payments
  2. SIMPONI ARIA $19,585 22 payments
  3. Bimzelx $8,616 14 payments
  4. RINVOQ $4,403 7 payments
  5. ORENCIA $65 4 payments
  6. Enbrel $55 3 payments
  7. RENFLEXIS $47 2 payments
  8. Cimzia $44 2 payments
  9. ENHERTU $43 1 payment
  10. Otezla $41 2 payments
  11. Other $203 15 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Eli Lilly and Company $50,320 3 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $1,067 11 payments

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 32 drugs

Part D claims

3,130

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$586,956

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

21.3%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 31 $254,335
Humira Pen Adalimumab Brand 13 $87,096
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 12 $86,328
Kevzara Sarilumab Brand 16 $71,575
Hydroxychloroquine Sulfate Generic 710 $34,629
Methotrexate Methotrexate Sodium Brand 488 $17,742
Mycophenolate Mofetil Generic 30 $6,748
Sulfasalazine Generic 139 $4,301
Prednisone Generic 436 $3,440
Duloxetine Hcl Generic 114 $2,834

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 32 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 98 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$2,121,588

Of which drugs: $1,958,388

Medicare patients

542

Average age 72

Services billed

162,520

404 women, 138 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Arthritis 75%
High blood pressure 69%
Osteoporosis 30%
Diabetes 25%
Ischemic heart disease 25%
Chronic kidney disease 23%
Depression 23%
COPD 19%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, abatacept, 10 mg (code may be used for medicare when drug administered under the direct supervision of a physician, not for use when drug is self administered) J0129 Office 44 13,000 $440,822
Injection, certolizumab pegol, 1 mg (code may be used for medicare when drug administered under the direct supervision of a physician, not for use when drug is self administered) J0717 Office 16 68,000 $245,623
Injection, infliximab, excludes biosimilar, 10 mg J1745 Office 62 8,130 $198,824
Injection, rituximab, 10 mg J9312 Office 14 2,600 $159,161
Injection, immune globulin, (gammagard liquid), non-lyophilized, (e.g., liquid), 500 mg J1569 Office 19 4,200 $144,465
Injection, tocilizumab, 1 mg J3262 Office 23 29,960 $131,219
Injection, golimumab, 1 mg, for intravenous use J1602 Office 24 7,300 $59,878
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 20 2,160 $44,325
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 70 13,480 $1,361
Injection, zoledronic acid, 1 mg J3489 Office 14 70 $354

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

2 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
TREMFYA
  • Janssen Biotech, Inc. $139
  • Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC $130
$269 — —
RINVOQ
  • AbbVie, Inc. $29
$29 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

96 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Rheumatology in Missouri

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record