Physician Assistant Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Timothy Cassidy

Physician Assistant Albany, NY Physician Assistant

NPI 1750948287 CMS profile 11040242

4 Tower Pl Fl 8, Albany, NY 12203

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$12,435

536 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Timothy Cassidy of Albany, NY is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $12,435 across 536 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 98th percentile of Physician Assistant profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,778 128
2024 General $2,802 138
2023 General $3,943 163
2022 General $2,650 104
2021 General $262 3

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Timothy Cassidy
  • Physician Assistant median
  • Middle half of Physician Assistant
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Timothy Cassidy were reported at $2,778. Among 68,903 Physician Assistant profiles paid that year, the median was $184 and the middle half received between $57 and $620.

Show as a table
Year Timothy Cassidy Physician Assistant median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $34 $17–$122 $163
2020 $0 $33 $16–$78 $114
2021 $262 $132 $37–$438 $132
2022 $2,650 $155 $48–$522 $149
2023 $3,943 $167 $52–$557 $160
2024 $2,802 $178 $55–$600 $164
2025 $2,778 $184 $57–$620 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $3,280 132 payments
  2. Amgen Inc. $1,757 72 payments
  3. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $1,707 97 payments
  4. Lilly USA, LLC $852 27 payments
  5. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $714 25 payments
  6. UCB, Inc. $682 34 payments
  7. Pfizer Inc. $522 33 payments
  8. Horizon Therapeutics plc $451 8 payments
  9. Mallinckrodt Hospital Products Inc. $419 13 payments
  10. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $393 21 payments
  11. Other $1,658 74 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $11,947 527 payments
  2. Education $488 9 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. RINVOQ $2,480 99 payments
  2. TREMFYA $1,652 92 payments
  3. BENLYSTA $714 25 payments
  4. TALTZ $712 23 payments
  5. XELJANZ $522 33 payments
  6. SKYRIZI $477 20 payments
  7. KRYSTEXXA $451 8 payments
  8. ACTHAR $419 13 payments
  9. Otezla $410 15 payments
  10. Cimzia $404 21 payments
  11. Other $4,875 239 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 34 drugs

Part D claims

1,950

Median for Physician Assistant: 241

Drug cost

$2,838,542

Median for Physician Assistant: $4,110

Branded share of claims

42.6%

Median for Physician Assistant: 19.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 92 $889,204
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 85 $702,277
Enbrel Mini Etanercept Brand 20 $240,389
Otezla Apremilast Brand 48 $201,649
Orencia Clickject Abatacept Brand 27 $182,667
Xeljanz Xr Tofacitinib Citrate Brand 20 $169,802
Humira Pen Adalimumab Brand 22 $147,428
Enbrel Etanercept Brand 15 $122,873
Rinvoq Upadacitinib Brand 14 $88,154
Actemra Tocilizumab Brand 13 $55,008

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 34 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 114,276 Part D prescribers listed as Physician Assistant; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 50 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$452,008

Of which drugs: $394,579

Medicare patients

240

Average age 73

Services billed

37,704

157 women, 83 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Arthritis 75%
High blood pressure 73%
Ischemic heart disease 34%
Osteoporosis 32%
Diabetes 28%
Chronic kidney disease 20%
Atrial fibrillation 17%
Depression 17%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, infliximab, excludes biosimilar, 10 mg J1745 Office 12 3,830 $95,499
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 27 2,460 $50,857
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 20 127 $85
Infusion, normal saline solution, 250 cc J7050 Office 32 148 $76

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 35 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
RINVOQ
$642 14 —
SKYRIZI
$308 — —
TREMFYA
$275 — —
BENLYSTA
$237 — —
XELJANZ
$143 20 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 35 with Patron

Records

536 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Physician Assistant in New York

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record